KitGuru KitGuru.net – Tech News | Hardware News | Hardware Reviews | IOS | Mobile | Gaming | Graphics Cards
Our unit came supplied with a single 1TB drive however you can insert a second drive if you wish and to do so you need to take the NAS apart.
Firstly we remove the top of the outer fascia by unscrewing two thumbscrews and then pulling forward. This exposes the naked chassis underneath.
Using a coin or a screwdriver we then need to remove three screws which hold the steel cage in place. Then we pull on the blue handle which forces the upper cage system out of the main carriage.
This is the main cage removed and ‘flipped' over. The hard drive is mounted into a SATA based daughterboard on the rear.
Above the primary drive is another slot for an additional hard drive to be mounted. This is a straightforward process and we like the option of being able to upgrade the storage in this manner.
Hitachi are the choosen manufacturer for this particular ASUS build and the drive is reasonably quiet.
The ATOM CPU as we can see resides under a heatsink with two 40mm fans to the left ensuring adequate airflow across the components. This motherboard is a FlexATX Asus manufactured product fitted with 2GB of laptop memory and the embedded N280 processor which is a 2.5W, single core Hyper Threaded CPU.
As can be seen in the image above, with the drive caddy rack system is flipped back to be reattached, the SATA card daughterboard slides into the motherboard slot bottom left in the images above. This is a PCI Express 1x slot.
Fitting this back in is a rather fiddly process and while not a massively complex procedure is not the best method we have seen in our labs. We would much rather have a system that just slides in on rails such as seen on the Synology unit we reviewed last month. Lining up the daughterboard with the slot without being able to actually see it makes life more difficult than it need be.
With two drives you would hope that the system would offer RAID modes, but unfortunately not. It does offer a mirrored folder duplication routine which means you can select which folders you want to duplicate onto the other drive.
That is quite expensive. the software is much better than the buffalo NAS, but its twice the price with the same 1TB storage. its not much faster either than the buffalo. Ah well, nice attempt by Asus
ouch, almost £400. id rather buy two 500 GB drives for the synology unit you guys reviewed recently and get much higher performance for about 50 quid more. Seems Asus need to get this dropped to around £270.
nice enough unit, if it was much faster, rather slow.
Thats £200 performance for £380. its not going to work for Asus really unless they target the PCworld audience, and they might not fork out so much for a NAS. has the potential to be great, but they need to drop the price by £100-130.
Asus have mistargeted this unit. The controller performance is sub £250 market, but they have put on expensive software which adds to the value, but they sell it for the same price as a naked synology 710+ which has basically twice the performance if you add your own drives.
Working it out. Synology 710 £380, same price as the asus without drives, so adding 1TB is about £50-60 more, 2TB is actually down to £90 now in the UK, so id go for that. get double the storage and double the performance for £90 more. seems like a no brainer to me. The buffalo on the other hand, is half the price and isnt actually much slower. Asus need to do more market research, might work on lesser sites, but we kitguru readers are too coy !
This is the issue with Windows. sure its awesome and user friendly but that system I bet is slower than a linux powered unit with a much weaker processor, this negates the power of the atom in this market place and everything feels sluggish. my friend has another unit with an atom processor in it running windows and it just grinds. The Linux OSes are much better and cost nothing to product. Asus assuredly have to pay out of t he pocket for this software.
Its a failed execution for asus, which is a shame as I like the appearance and internal strucutre.
You know, I read this review and thought, ok its not that fast but for £250 its a good buy, and was going to order one until I saw the price.
Asus, WTF?! I also saw the review on bittech of this earlier and they scored it lower than Kitguru, seems a bad product pricing. If they have put in a raid 0 system and offered 2tb for this price, it would be a great buy, but a single 60 quid drive and no raid 0 options even if you want them later? no jumbo frame options is also shocking in a unit like this.
Disappointing product, but I like it. just needs to drop in price to be a worthwhile purchase. I hate the way companies market these as ‘gigabit’ capable but they really struggle to achieve even a third of the rated performance at times.
Asus make some stunning motherboards and even their promotional graphics cards are wicked but once they step outside these zones, they tend to falter a little. they make some nice laptops however.
Windows is always the death of these NAS systems.
Why? the companies like asus need to charge moer to cover the costs that microsoft inflict. they run slower than any other OS due to the bloated code. performance is a bit poor for the price however, thats something they should look into.
Also Zardon I tink your review scored it too high, bittech are more accurate giving it 5 out of 10. you are too generous.
Zardon I read the bit tech review last month actually on this and I just refreshed my memory, they said it got 8 MB/s write speed? and 6.2 MB/s read speed? thats way under 100mbit, never mind 1000mbit. Are they wrong?
Hi Francois, I can’t comment on other websites and its not really ethical of us to do so anyway. id rather concentrate on what we do here rather than what anyone else does.
I can say however that the testing we performed was handled over a dedicated belkin 16 port gigabit switch which is one of the best on the market (I find so anyway). so our testing is pretty much limited by the devices rather than issues with the network. im positive the results I posted are accurate in our own environment.
Zardon, thats why I come here, I almost didnt buy the Noctua NH D14 after reading the bit tech review when the product was launched, they gave it performance 6 out of 10 or something ridiculous. Then I read your review and it was almost 10/10. I bought one via a dealer here and it is incredible. I rest my case 🙂
I think you’re missing the point. This is not a NAS, it’s a server. Aside from providing file sharing, it does fully automated incremental backups of up to 10 PCs on the network, bare-metal restore of a fried or infected box, remote access to all PCs on the network through RDP, and has dozens of excellent add-in programs providing features like integrated off-site backup. You can plug in a stack of external USB drives to easily increase the capacity. It’s a lousy NAS, but it’s a very good value as a server. Don’t compare it to NAS boxes, compare it to HP MediaSmarts and other WHS boxes..
Dont think its missing the point myself. I know the QNAP have a lot of that functionality Alan and even the synology can be connected to USB and even eSATA drives. I also am pretty sure QNAP can offer automated backups.
While Alan Jones makes some good points, the ‘NAS’ marketplace in 2010 is so advanced that many of them are actually ‘server’ systems, even if they aren’t running Windows operating systems. Synology systems for instance, one of which was reviewed here, can offer esata and USB drive connectivity for additional storage. they can offer media streaming, bitorrent functionality and even server duties such as FTP and other things. QNAP are much the same, as their NAS systems, even offer backup duties and almost everything I can see that this Asus ‘server’ system supports.