KitGuru KitGuru.net – Tech News | Hardware News | Hardware Reviews | IOS | Mobile | Gaming | Graphics Cards
The first test we decided to use was the Game Network Efficiency (GANE) Test, which is in place to simulate real world network performance for online PC games. This test is used to create a gaming load on a Windows PC as well as transmission of gaming network traffic over a local network. This test is also designed to test two network cards at once making direct comparisons between both at the same time.
The setup is a little complex, but ill describe it in a step by step manner.
Firstly you connect the host (listen/server) PC to a gigabit switch through the standard onboard gigabit ethernet connection. The Killer 2100 is then installed on the other test PC and it is connected to the gigabit switch via both the Killer Network gaming card and the onboard NIC.
On the server PC we then configure the properties of the onboard network card to have a static IP address. We then adjust the subnet mask to 255.255.255.0. The test PC is then configured in a similar manner, but we assign different static IP's to both the onboard NIC and the Killer 2100. Again the subnet mask is set to 255.255.255.0.
On the main test PC we then go into advanced via the IPv3 properties window. We then uncheck the ‘Automatic Metric” box and set the metric value to “1”. Both cards need this applied as the NIC uses it to send network traffic. If we leave this setting at ‘automatic', Windows does not alternate between the NICs and instead will send all the traffic through one card rendering the test useless.
The next stage is to run GANE on both the server/listen PC and the main test rig. GANE measures then compares latency between two network cards installed on any PC. This is handled by a procedure of sending 100 byte packets over the local network on a round trip, every 50ms. Kitguru has selected 100bytes as the packet size because this is a good real world representation of a standard network packet. We want to run this size specifically to test Bigfoots claims that many network cards are not optimised for this ‘game' related data packet size.
While we set up the server PC we also need to run a game benchmark on the main PC and in this case we will use Resident Evil 5 in DX10 mode with the built in benchmark at maximum settings on our screen at 1920×1200 resolution. While we are running this, we are sending packets between both NICs on the main PC to the receiving (listening) PC. This mirrors a real life situation of playing a game online while transmitting data back and forward.
Adapter 1 is the Killer 2100 and Adapter 2 is the onboard Intel solution. The results above show that the Killer 2100 is 4.0 faster than the on board solution and delivers a result with almost 25 times less jitter. On a lesser solution this can actually be as high as 35 times faster with 120 times less jitter!
Our average UDP ping was 0.000287643 on the Killer 2100 and it was 0.003075006 on the Intel solution. Our average mean ping was 0.232525 on the Killer 2100 and 0.921490 on the Intel solution. The worst case scenario is more critical as it could cause lag online. The Intel solution is 5.287735 while it is 0.355063 on the Killer 2100 … massive differences. Bear in mind this is obviously over a very tight local network, but when heading online to game on a server thousands of miles away this will increase, exponentially.
Wow this really makes a difference, glad to see its not just ‘scientifically’ proven though. real world testing seems good also. Worth looking into, but its quite a lot of money. I guess its basically a ‘mini PC on a card’.
Its hard to dismiss technical testing like this at the end of the day, although I agree with Zardon, I thought these were gimmicks designed to sell to gamers who had more money than sense. Clearly not. Good education in this article, the reason I love kitguru.
There have been some really educational articles on kitguru this year already, but I agree this one really opened my eyes to another area I had no idea existed.
Very good reading this morning, thanks Z. Interesting to see the latency improvements in such a technical way. Most articles just show subjective testing and I always feel the companies are paying the reviewers to write it. This all makes sense. PowerPC processor on a network card? thats impressive!
I can only assume that the relatively high asking price puts most people off, because it all makes such sense that these DO work. even the earlier versions did work. network activity can not only put a high load on a CPU, but the cards are just generalised when it comes to component configuration. These cards really do offer a much more focused platform for gamers.
I gotta hand it to zardon, these articles are always so good to read. even technical stuff can be understood. Great stuff.
Very entertaining read, even though networking tends to bore me to sleep. Not sure id pay £100 for a card like this as I dont game online much, but I would think that people who play a lot of FPS titles online and need maximum response time would love one.
Very very expensive for what you get, but in reality if you spend all your spare time gaming then I would say this is a good buy as Zardon says. for the rest of us? Not so sure. well balanced review, I like the conclusion
Havent had time this morning to read it in depth, but I read the conclusion and will read the rest later. 8.5/10 for a £100 network card? it better be a good product!
I have the older card, the K1 and it works very well, I always notice when I use ordinary cards as when im gaming online in BC2 I get lags. I never get lags with a bigfoot. very good product, but yeah a bit costly, I think if they could drop the price by 30% they would sell a lot more.
Far too much to spend on a network card. well for me anyway, I play the odd title online but I never really notice much lag. the CPU use drop is interesting, that might help some people who are struggling to maintain performance on their system?
I wonder if professional gaming clans use these? advantage maybe?
I doubt pro gamers use these, they normally game locally in events when the local networks are well optimised.
Maybe im wrong. Not sure im sold on this still. the lags are better no doubt about it, but I wonder how it translates to a majority of games online.
Well I wasn’t expecting something this positive. surprised me, in a nice way.
I would like to try one out before forking out the money as I do play online often and can suffer from ping issues.
ive read mixed reports on these products, but the testing has never really been detailed in any way.
Rather inspired to do the variety of testing you did, in the context of a local network and with online tools available. It certainly seems to cut the mustard with your test results.
Very compelling results. I think I will take a risk and order one online now. I have some issues with WOW lately and I think this would help, going on the test results.
I had the K1, and I thought it was good, but it got damaged when I moved house a year ago. I shall order one of these myself as I like a good gaming network card, my onboard broadcom sucks.
It is expensive, however the processor on the card is actually quite costly to produce, even though its not a high powered main CPU by todays standards. Its a reasonably priced product and the software aspect alone makes it worth it.
My brother plays in a clan and he has one of these already. he says it really helps to cut out lag when he games across continents online.
the TCP performance is staggering, that alone is worth the money IMO.
£100 for a network card? thats more than the Sapphier HD5670 Ultimate Edition you reviewed here a while ago.
It seems very very overpriced.
It is serious money, but I think its probably worth it if people want the best network connection they can get to the outside world.
I bought one of these last week, its working very well. Helped my COD MW2 online performance.
No denying the performance giong on the test results, but the price? Thats way over the odds for what I would pay. they should do a lite version or a cheaper one. I could get a decent CPU for a little more.
Great review, loved the detailed analysis sections. Only problem I have is why is it so expensive?
Those complaining about the price need to understand that the software suite development alone is comprehensive and costly to produce. Not sure they could make a lite version, as the new 2100 is basically already a lite version of the older cards made for performance.
Personally I found the review rather complex and I didnt understand some parts of it. it seems fast, but how does it actually help my gaming? by just reducing latency via packets? £100 for that?
The card has a processor onboard (powerpc) with DDR2 memory, its basically not only been designed to optimise packets back and forward but its taking the load from the main CPU in the system. its basically a little computer on a card. While networking seems a rather weird choice to offload to another CPU, it can cause interupts to the main CPU which can even sometimes cause hitching. probably not on a 4.8ghz Core i7 mind you, but those gaming on a lower end CPU would benefit more.
Yeah, its for all intents and purposes a stripped down mini computer on a card, its not just a network card which is often just a little chip to manage throughput. this card is doing so much more, and there is even a software interface and updates available to flash it. I wouldnt recommend you use this outside Windows 7 however, its getting primary focus from bigfoot on Windows 7. not XP.
I think ill invest in one of these, my BT broadband is giving me massive issues when I go online. it might not cure it completely but im sure it would help. thanks for the detailed review, most useful.
Zardon, if I buy this and it sucks, im hunting you down 🙂
Hey. I’m the community manager for Bigfoot Networks, the people who designed the card. Just wanted to toss out to the fellow who was curious whether or not pro-gamers use the card: Yep, they do. We actually sponsor several major eSports teams, too, including Fnatic, SK-Gaming, Evil Geniuses, Team-Dignitas, and more.
Also, really cool to see a review go so in-depth. 🙂 And thanks to all of the commentors for the feedback!
I play a lot of COD4 and MW2 and this thing helps significantly in those close calls where you and your opponent shoot at the same time. I am playing better, getting more kills and winning more. For $120, this beats a lot of other things you can get for your rig. Buy it – try it – love it – don’t deny it.
I am regular visitor, how are you everybody? This piece of
writing posted at this site is actually nice.
I seldom write responses, but I looked at a few of the remarks here BigFoot Killer 2100 Gaming
Network Card Review | KitGuru – Part 6. I actually do have 2 questions for you if it’s allright.
Is it simply me or do some of these remarks come across like they
are written by brain dead individuals? 😛 And, if you are posting at other online
sites, I would like to keep up with you. Could you make
a list of every one of your shared pages like your linkedin profile, Facebook page or
twitter feed?
Aw, this was a very nice post. Spending some time and actual effort to generate
a really good article… but what can I say…
I put things off a lot and never manage to get nearly anything done.