Home / Peripheral / Monitors / Asus MS236H Ultra Slim Panel review

Asus MS236H Ultra Slim Panel review

We tested the monitor via a Sapphire ATI HD5850 graphics card and Catalyst 10.6 with a DVI to HDMI converter cable.

The Asus MS236H Technical specifications are quite impressive, with it boasting a 50,000:1 contrast ratio and a 2ms grey-to-grey response time and when this is combined with an apparent 170 degree horizontal viewing angle you would rightly assume that the image quality would be stellar.

We tested the monitor with Displaymate and were unimpressed with the overall image quality. The colour gamut range in GamutVision was generally positive and it fell in line with what we would expect from a panel in this class. Text was sharp and easy to read and while colour reproduction was not outstanding it was able to handle a wide enough gamut to present a focused and realistic image.

As this is a twisted nematic panel the horizontal viewing angles were acceptable and vertical quality dropped when viewed from below, specifically noticeable with colour shifting. Unless you have the screen mounted high in a kitchen or living room environment we would struggle to see this being a significant issue.

Gaming on the monitor was actually a strong point as I noticed no input lag at all and would say that Asus are fairly accurate with their 2ms rating.

The weakness of this screen would be detail in the darker areas of the range, around 90-100% black level viewing. It loses detail in dark scenes and the purity of the black level leaves a little to be desired. This is a common issue with lower end TN panel technology however and we noticed that images rendering pure black ended up looking rather washed out. Our sample had some backlight issues on the lower edges although it seemed to have suffered some abuse from previous reviewers so it is hard to tell if this is just specific to the screen I received or a more generalised overview of the entire production range.

We measured considerable shift and bleeding when testing black definition with leaks on all sides of the panel. While it looks bad in the image above, it is only really noticeable when watching movies with a lot of dark or night based scenes. This is a shame as we found otherwise it was a rather good screen for motion based viewing and for gaming thanks to the quick response time. Sadly it is lacking with scaling options which will mean many gamers will immediately disregard it as a viable option.

On the other side of the testing range, white response was much better with a generally clear image being presented. Only slight leaks are noted on the four corners, with the worst areas being on the lower sections of the physical panel.

Become a Patron!

Check Also

Our Top 3 OLED Monitors of 2024!

We pick our top three OLED monitors for 2024!

14 comments

  1. As I posted in the forums, I bought this screen on sale a while ago and agree. the image quality is ok, I actually think my old dell is better for IQ and its not a new LCD either 🙁

    It looks beautiful, but its better switched off ! (well its not quite that bad, but I am disappointed and sorry I didnt go for the LED version).

  2. that is very pretty. shame the panel isnt better. LED review coming? hope so !

  3. Nice design, really hits the spot. shame about the lack of DVI in and the other issues mentioned. seems quite poorly thought out once they worked out the chassis design.

  4. I saw one of these in a store. The higher end LED screen I think as it cost a lot more. I liked it. this one is clearly a bit more of a budget design.

  5. oh dear, thats a pity, liked the look of it.

  6. Wow, such an unbalanced product. all that time on design, moving out the power supply to an external unit to save on space. then they dont include a DVI port, or an adapter cable and mess up the interface buttons and slap in an average screen. Seems the money you spend goes to the designers. 🙁

  7. @ Fluffychicken – heh, looks like Apple did make it :p

  8. disappointing and probably good in a living room when people who dont really care that much about fine details. my parents would like this, but its too small for a TV or media center system.

  9. Man, that sucks, I had looked at this model a while ago as an online store is discounting them right now. Looks like the higher end LED model might be the one to go for.

  10. Not sure I even like the looks. that circular stand idea looks like a disaster waiting to happen and probably quite unstable. All the issues with the product make it hard to even put in a shortlist.

  11. Hey guys, I wouldnt be getting too carried away with the LED MS238H version either, apparently there is a greenish hue with it. CNET reviewed it, looks quite bad.

    http://reviews.cnet.com/lcd-monitors/asus-ms238h/4505-3174_7-33920330.html

  12. @ Brad. thanks man, I agree it looks pretty crap after reading about it 🙁 seems looks are more important than quality for this range of screens. Hopefully they make new models with good panels in them.

  13. Hey Zardon, I read on CNET they said this

    “The stand keeps the monitor stabilized when knocked from the sides; however, when it encounters a force from the front–like a light breeze–it topples over.”

    You never said the stand was unstable, is it bad or what?

  14. Hi Stefan. The stand is fine, well I never experienced issues with it. I wouldn’t say it would withstand a hard knock without tilting over, but I dont think it would be an issue, unless you balanced it near the end of a desk and had a careless, clumsy friend.