Home / Tech News / Featured Tech News / Gigabyte Aorus FO27Q3 Review (1440p/360Hz QD-OLED)

Gigabyte Aorus FO27Q3 Review (1440p/360Hz QD-OLED)

Monitor response time testing is a new addition to our reviews, where we use the Open Source Response Time Tool (OSRTT), developed by TechTeamGB. This measures grey-to-grey response times and presents the results in a series of heatmaps, the style of which you may be familiar with from other reviews.

Initial Response Time is the time taken for the panel to transition from one colour to another, where lower values are better. We present the initial response time, so overshoot is not taken into account and is measured separately. We use a fixed RGB 5 tolerance for each transition.

Overshoot is the term given for when a monitor's transition exceeds or goes beyond its target value. So if a monitor was meant to transition from RGB 0 to RGB 55, but it hits RGB 60 before settling back down at RGB 55, that is overshoot. This is presented as RGB values in the heatmaps – i.e. how many RGB values past the intended target were measured.

Visual Response Rating is a metric designed to ‘score' a panel's visual performance, incorporating both response times and overdrive. Fast response times with little to no overshoot will score well, while slow response times or those with significant overshoot will score poorly.

We test the FO27Q3 at 360Hz.

Given the FO27Q3 is an OLED, we're not focusing too heavily on the response times as we know the results will all be fantastic. As we can see from this test at 360Hz, the average response time is right around the 1ms mark and that stays the same regardless of the refresh rate.

Of course, that doesn't mean motion clarity will be perfect at any refresh rate – the higher you can push the refresh, the smoother things look. Still, the difference between 240Hz and 360Hz isn't huge, but as I have said previously, I do think it is perceptible.

I've also compared the FO27Q3 against MSI's Oculux NXG253R using its Fast overdrive mode. That's a 360Hz IPS LCD, and it's a clear win for the Aorus display in motion clarity, with no visible ghosting whatsoever. I don't have access to any of the latest 540Hz LCDs, but hopefully that will change in the near future!

For final confirmation of the response time performance, we can see all the OLEDs I've tested clumped together at the top of the chart.

Become a Patron!

Check Also

Intel’s x86S initiative has been abandoned

Intel has officially abandoned its plans for its own-developed x86S specification, a streamlined version of …