Home / Lifestyle / Mobile / Apple / Apple bans “bonded servitude” of factory workers

Apple bans “bonded servitude” of factory workers

When a new Apple product is being made, production ramps up massively in factories that supply components and products to it, this obviously necessitates a large hiring spree by these factories. Until recently these workers could be charged more than a month's salary in recruitment fees by the agency that hired them, rather than passing this cost on to the company that they are hired for. The good news is that Apple has finally got around to banning this practice by its suppliers.

Jeff Williams, Apple senior vice president of operations, said “That fee needs to be paid by the supplier and Apple ultimately bears that fee when we pay the supplier and we're OK doing that, we just don't want the worker to absorb that.” Why it has taken this long for the practice to be banned by Apple is another question and one that we unfortunately do not have an answer for.
Electronics_factory_in_Shenzhen
Williams also said that conditions are improving and they are not finished yet “Every year we raise our standards and we look for opportunities that will either make things simpler or, for places where we feel like we need to be, more rigorous.” He also mentioned that “It is in essence bonded servitude, the suppliers that hire them sometimes don’t know anything about this but the worker’s passport is sometimes held.”

Apple audits all of its suppliers and has done so since 2008, with this being the 9th report. This was started after the massive controversy over the findings in 2006 of major breaches of acceptable working conditions and was stepped up further after a series of worker suicides in 2010. Workers for some suppliers are now forced to sign an agreement stating that they will not kill themselves. These issues are still ongoing despite Apples reports as a BBC Watchdog investigation recently uncovered in 2014.

Discuss on our Facebook page, HERE.

KitGuru Says: I am shocked that this was not something that Apple suppliers were banned from doing since 2008. Then again judging by the recent undercover investigations by the BBC it seems that little has really changed and lots of Apples suppliers are still treating workers terribly.

Source: Bloomberg
Image source: Steve Jurvetson

Become a Patron!

Check Also

SEGA Apple Arcade

SEGA accidentally teases another Apple Arcade exclusive Sonic game

In a now-deleted post, SEGA teased that they are working on a new Apple Arcade-exclusive Sonic game, seemingly inspired by Sonic Rush.

2 comments

  1. No big fan of Apple but having been in the Asia theater for over 10 years in the electronics industry I can say with certainty that the fee charged is common to all recruiting companies in China, not only workers going to Apple. The fact that Apple seem to have managed to break this is a good thing, although it remains to be seen if recruitment agencies find some other way to milk the cow. Apple has audited several facilities I’m involved with and their audits are very comprehensive, auditors showed unusually high integrity for China.

  2. Well i can guess why they JUST changed it. same reason ANY big company makes changes: Because it became too public, nothing more.