Home / Component / APU / AMD roadmap leaks: Summit Ridge, Bristol Ridge, Basilisk and Styx

AMD roadmap leaks: Summit Ridge, Bristol Ridge, Basilisk and Styx

An alleged AMD insider has published what it appears to be the company’s microprocessor roadmap for 2016. If the plan is accurate and AMD manages to execute it, then next year the company will release a top-to-bottom family of central processing units based on “Zen” micro-architecture as well as one chip featuring its own ARMv8-compatible “K12” cores.

AMD’s “Zen” technology will be used not only for high-performance central processing units as well as accelerated processing units, but also for system-on-chips designed for inexpensive and small form-factor applications, reveals a slide from AMD roadmap for 2016. For applications like tablets AMD intends to offer all-new system-on-chip powered by its ARMv8-compatible “K12” cores, another slide claims. All of AMD's APUs and CPUs due next year are set to be made by GlobalFoundries. Officially, the company’s plans for 2016 are expected to be presented next week, but an alleged employee of AMD published the slides on Wednesday.

“Summit Ridge”: High-performance eight-core AMD processors due next year

After years of waiting, in 2016 AMD plans to introduce its all-new high-performance processors that will replace its current-generation FX-series chips. The new CPUs are going to be based on the brand-new AMD “Zen” microarchitecture that is expected to dramatically improve performance of AMD’s offerings.

amd_roadmap_desktop_2016_zen

As reported, AMD’s high-performance desktop microprocessor due next year will be code-named “Summit Ridge”. The CPU will integrate up to eight “Zen” cores, 4MB L2 cache, 8MB of L3 cache, a dual-channel DDR4 memory controller (DDR3 support should be possible), a PCI Express 3.0 controller as well as other necessary logic. The chip will use AMD’s new FM3 form-factor.

The new central processing unit will be made using 14nm FinFET manufacturing technology at GlobalFoundries. Keeping in mind positioning of AMD FX-series chips, it is highly likely that “Summit Ridge” processors will be optimized for high clock-rates. Still, they are projected to be made using a standard fabrication process since the company is moving away from AMD-specific technologies.

Two or more “Summit Ridge” dies are expected to be used to build many-core AMD Opteron multi-chip-modules (MCMs) for servers.

“Bristol Ridge”: AMD’s first high-performance system-on-chip for desktops and laptops

This year AMD offers two different APUs for desktops and laptops: a classic “Godavari” APU that is designed to run at high clock-rates and a highly-integrated “Carrizo” that is optimized for low power consumption. Next year AMD plans to unify its design approaches and will again offer a “one size fits all” APU code-named “Bristol Ridge”.

amd_roadmap_mobility_2016_zen_k12

AMD’s code-named “Bristol Ridge” chip will be the company’s high-end APU for 2016 desktops and laptops. Highly-integrated “Bristol Ridge” accelerated processing unit will feature up to four “Zen” cores, a Radeon graphics processing unit powered by next-generation GCN architecture, full HSA 1.0 implementation, a dual-channel DDR4 memory controller (DDR3 support should be possible), an integrated input/output controller as well as AMD TrueAudio and Secure Processor technologies.

“Bristol Ridge” APUs for desktops will use the same FM3 form-factor as AMD’s high-end microprocessors.

Mobile versions of “Bristol Ridge” will feature 15W – 35W TDP, will sport FP4 BGA package and will be pin-to-pin compatible with “Carrizo” and ”Carrizo-L” APUs.

While “Bristol Ridge” accelerated processing unit is going to be made using a 14nm fabrication process, given the fact that it will be a system-on-chip – like “Carrizo” – it is highly likely that the processor will not be optimized for high clock-rates. Still, thanks to thinner process technology and new micro-architecture, “Bristol Ridge” APUs will likely offer significantly higher performance compared to existing offerings.

“Basilisk”: Small chip based on “big” architecture

For years, AMD used its low-cost/low-power micro-architectures for its accelerated processing units aimed at inexpensive and energy-efficient notebooks and desktops. In 2016, the company plans to use its high-performance “Zen” micro-architecture to build APUs aimed at basic PCs.

amd_fusion_pencil

AMD’s “Basilisk” accelerated processing unit is projected to have thermal design power of only 5-15W, but it is going to pack a punch. With up to two “Zen” cores, a Radeon graphics processing unit powered by next-generation GCN architecture, full HSA 1.0 implementation, an integrated input/output controller as well as AMD TrueAudio and Secure Processor technologies, “Basilisk” will support all the features of its older brother, “Bristol Ridge”.

The chip will be manufactured at GlobalFoundries using its 14nm FinFET process technology, hence, expect decent clock-rates for an ultra-low-power SoC.

AMD’s “Basilisk” APUs will feature FT4 BGA form-factor, like the rest of AMD’s offerings for mobile applications in 2016.

“Styx”: The first implementation of “K12” for client PCs

AMD has been trying to address the market of media tablets with x86-based offerings since 2011, but without a lot of luck with design wins. Next year the company is going to change its strategy.

amd_fusion_chip_logo_processor

AMD’s “Styx” accelerated processing unit will be the company’s first system-on-chip to integrate the its own 64-bit ARMv8-A instruction set-compatible cores. The APU will also contain a Radeon graphics processing unit powered by next-generation GCN architecture, full HSA 1.0 implementation, built-in input/output capabilities as well as Secure Processor technology.

Thermal design power of the chip will be around 2W and the offering will naturally be aimed at tablets, emerging devices (e.g., set-top-boxes with gaming capabilities, game consoles) and ultra-low-voltage hybrids. The SoC will use FT4 BGA form-factor and will be pin-to-pin compatible with “Basilisk” and “Amur” APUs.

Just like other 2016 chips from AMD, “Styx” will be made using 14nm fabrication process at GlobalFoundries.

AMD did not comment on the news-story.

Discuss on our Facebook page, HERE.

KitGuru Says: AMD’s client PC roadmaps for next year look very promising on paper. Hopefully, AMD can execute its plans and actual performance of “Zen” will be as impressive as everyone thinks it is.

Become a Patron!

Check Also

AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D leak shows 5.65 GHz boost clock speed and 170W TDP

A leaked CPU-Z screenshot with AMD's Ryzen 9 9950X3D processor has surfaced online, revealing key …

8 comments

  1. I hope 2017 will be a good year for AMD, and no that 7 is not a typo.

  2. For some odd reason, I feel as if “Summit Ridge” processors will be “Bristol Ridge” APUs just without the built in GPU. Speculation leads to this because of the same FM3 form factor. If the leaked slides are true, then the APU will have one “Zen Unit” and the CPU will have 2 “Zen Units” considering the fact each unit has 4 Zen Cores. I’m anxious to see how it performs and how many different products they can milk out of this new architecture. I’d like to see a 4 Zen Unit CPU somewhere down the line that isn’t a business class product.

  3. If they make it past 2016 without being bought by Samsung and then rebranded.

  4. Probably, since Trinity and Richland are FX-43xx with iGPU.

  5. they won’t be bought by samsung…way too many complicated stuff and also it would screw up intel’s amd64 license(which means no x64 compatible intel cpus

  6. Wow, this is very exciting news. I hope AMD can get back on track.

  7. Plus they cant make processors because of intel x86 licences.but i think it would be a fair agreement to just share those two licences though. AMD is fine though, they have total Console market so if anything, they would just scale down as a company but i imagine ZEN is going to be profitable.

  8. amd64 has evolved to such a level that it could easily live without x86.problem is both amd and intel need plenty of other licences to one another. If till 2008 intel could have easily lived without amd (hence their dirty tricks that helped amd lose share) nowadays they kinda have to work together and help their competitor back on the feet.