One of the most scandalous claims in recent years hit the tech industry in early June this year, when CaseLabs, maker of some quite innovative chassis designs accused industry giant Thermaltake of ripping off its cases, as well as the designs of other manufacturers like Fractal and NZXT. While this was seemingly backed up by plenty of evidence, Caselabs has now issued a retraction letter for the claims it made.
This letter was publicised by Thermaltake and detailed as an ‘apology' for the accusations previously made by CaseLabs. It reads:
“CaseLabs acknowledges that it does not own any patents on any of its case products. CaseLabs' postings, which suggested that litigating to enforce patents would be prohibitively expensive, were misleading, because they implied that CaseLabs actually owned patents, which it does not. CaseLabs regrets this error. CaseLabs apologizes for accusing Mr. Robb and Thermaltake of “stealing” anything.”
It goes on to point out that all cases will have some similarities due to the nature of their function. However the big tone of the letter is less apology, and more pointing out that it cannot legally make those claims without patents to back it up.
Previous comments made by CaseLabs also accused Thermaltake of deliberately undercutting its designs, as well as copying them. This too it retracted in the letter:
“CaseLabs acknowledges that price competition is fundamental to a healthy marketplace, and CaseLabs recognizes that it has no right to prevent Thermaltake from offering a competing product for a lower price in the marketplace. CaseLabs retracts any suggestion that competitors are not entirely free to engage in price competition for such unpatentable products as CaseLabs' computer cases.”
In all fairness, CaseLabs cannot prevent other companies from leveraging their size, manufacturing chops or contacts in countries with cheaper labour in order to produce products cheaply and therefore offer them at a better price. The tone is still very much linked with legal obligation though, rather than an outright apology.
Thermaltake's response to the letter has been positive, and it speaks of its interest in returning to healthy competition with CaseLabs and others in the near future. You can read it in its entirety here.
CaseLabs has also sent a letter to LegitReviews, which asked it to pull its coverage of the original Facebook post that started this all off. At the time of writing, it's still up and can be read here.
Discuss on our Facebook page, HERE.
KitGuru Says: Considering the legal language being thrown around here, we'll be a little careful with any of our opinions on this one. What do you guys think of the similarities though? How do you feel about the way Thermaltake has handled it?
Blatant rip-off
After reading the statements I feel rather sorry for poor Caselabs 🙁
On a small plus side though Caselabs can now feel free to copy any other design they want as long as it’s not patented !
This is rubbing salt in an already very open wound. Thermaltake should have left this as is and come up with some new designs, not used their muscle to demand a ‘legaleize’ apology from poor CaseLabs. Caselabs may have ‘had’ to issue this statement but be assured the community will not forget.
Well that’s the issue isn’t it? They have a hard time coming up with their own designs.
LOL caselabs have to be retards. who doesnt patent their own IP ? then get upset when someone copies it? WTF lol
all is fair in love and war!
Why am I not at all surprised…..
Sad that TT decided to push this further knowing they copied and that Caselabs couldn’t do anything about it. Yes, it’s Caselabs fault in the grand scheme of things but if morality is to be considered(in business I’d say never) then TT is a real piece of ****.
Plan to try and avoid them in future when possible.
dude there are only so many things you can do with a metal rectangle otherwise one could argue that the Caselabs Cases are a blatent ripoff of a Corsair 900D.
The fact is Thermaltake offers a similar design at a much cheaper price where Caselabs has the advantage is quality of materials.
Thing is, it’s not just physical similarities. Thermaltake copied everything down to the holes, including punch outs for casters it does not offer but CaseLabs does.
Thermaltake flat out ripping off a few companies just matter of time. Before big companies like Corsair swiftech fractal design go after thermaltake and Sue them. Thermaltake just blackmailed caselabs in too putting out that letter because caselabs is a small business and can’t fight the bigger company in court. That’s only reason caselabs put out the letter.
You are aware the 900D came later than any of the single tower design by CaseLabs
Cause it cost a lot of money and they aren’t a big company. http://www.wipo.int/pct/en/fees/
World Media Jobs 589$ per day
>c
http://www.Top World Media Point//Digital//jobs
Suppressor F51 has so many better things than the R5 (bigger window, MUCH better filtering system, 20 cm front fan, all black interior, IO, bays modularity, top fans mounting option, etc) that if they copied the design and then made it better, we should not be complaining, but thanking thermaltake.
I would buy an F51 and I wouldn’t buy an R5. The only thing R5 is better and Thermaltake didn’t copied was the botton filter that spans the entire case and is removable from the front. I would love to see that in the F51 and actually in all other cases in the market.
Imagine if no one copied the best solutions and ideas. The case market would be a horrible place for customers to make a choice…