Home / Component / APU / Legendary microprocessor developer Jim Keller leaves AMD

Legendary microprocessor developer Jim Keller leaves AMD

Advanced Micro Devices on Friday said that Jim Keller, a legendary microprocessor architect, will leave the company, effective immediately. Mr. Keller worked on multiple future generations of central processing units (CPUs) and system-on-chips (SoCs) at AMD, his departure will have an effect on the company’s long-term roadmap, but will not have any effect on products in the next several years.

No immediate effect on product roadmap

AMD indicated that Jim Keller leaves the company after just three years to “pursue other opportunities.” Mark Papermaster, AMD’s chief technology officer, will be the acting leader of CPU architecture development group previously led by Mr. Keller. Eventually, AMD will have to find a decent replacement for the legendary chip architect.

“Deep team was in place to drive completion phase of our next-generation ‘Zen’ core and associated system IP and SOCs,” said Drew Prairie, director of corporate communications at AMD. “Jim Keller’s departure is not expected to impact our public product or technology roadmaps, and we remain on track for ‘Zen’ availability in 2016 with first full year of revenue in 2017. There are no other organizational changes related to Jim’s departure.”

amd_cpu_jim_keller

Jim Keller, a legendary CPU architect, is best known for such high-performance designs as DEC’s Alpha 21164 and 21264, AMD’s “K8” (Athlon 64/Opteron), Apple’s “Swift”, “Cyclone”, “Typhoon” as well as multiple successful PowerPC- and MIPS-based system-on-chips. After Mr. Keller completed his work on “K8”, he left AMD in 1999. He returned to AMD in 2012.

“Zen” and “K12”

At AMD, Mr. Keller was responsible for development of the company’s next-generation x86 and ARM micro-architectures, including “Zen”, “Zen+”, “K12” and others. AMD claims that microprocessors based on its “Zen” cores will offer 40 per cent higher instructions per clock performance compared to “Excavator” x86 cores.

While a micro-architecture is crucially important for success of multiple generations of products, relatively small groups of people design it. Moreover, it does not take too long to create a modern CPU micro-architecture on a high-level. What does take a long time is implementation of actual hardware blocks inside processor cores (instruction fetchers/decoders, schedulers, arithmetic logic units, floating point units, etc.), development of various “un-core” components (pre-fetchers, internal interconnections, caches, memory controllers, interfaces, etc.), design and implementation of actual chips based on the architecture and hardware blocks. As a result, CPUs that are sold today are powered by micro-architectures developed many years ago.

“Architecture decisions are many years in advance of products,” explained the representative for AMD. “As you may remember, he was a primary architect on K8. We launched that product in 2003 and he had left AMD in 1999.”

amd_ati_compass_atyt_strategy_bg

The development of “Zen” (znver1) and “Zen+” (znver2) micro-architectures – which AMD has disclosed – has been completed a long time ago. At this point Mr. Keller’s CPU architecture design team may be finalizing the third iteration of Zen (znver3) or starting high-level design of the fourth iteration of Zen (znver4). Development of the “K12” and the “K12+” micro-architectures, which share a lot of innovations with “Zen”, has been finished too. It is highly likely that the departure of Mr. Keller will not significantly affect AMD’s products due in 2016 – 2018, all products based on “Zen” and “K12” cores will see the light of day.

“We have a multi-generation roadmap in place to further enhance and improve the core well into the future,” said Mr. Prairie. “Our focus is on high-performance, scalable, 64-bit x86 and ARM cores.”

amd_opteron_2016_2017

CPU development pipeline

Throughout its history, Advanced Micro Devices has developed a number of breakthrough micro-architectures and technologies that were years ahead of what their competitors offered at the time. Unfortunately, AMD did not always have enough resources to pursue new opportunities. So, when AMD decided to design two micro-architectures instead of one in 2005 – 2006, it was a risky decision, which eventually negatively affected the whole CPU development pipeline at the company. Fortunately, the pipeline has been fixed by now, thanks to Mark Papermaster and Jim Keller.

In the past, AMD had multiple CPU architecture development teams based in different locations (including Sunnyvale, California; Boxborough, Massachusetts; Fort Collins, Colorado, etc.). Different teams designed and enhanced different micro-architectures and were very dedicated to their work. While this seemed to make sense in the 2000s, when the company designed only microprocessors, it would not work nowadays. As a result, Rory Read and Mark Papermaster, who joined the company in 2011 as the chief executive officer and the chief technology officer, decided to cease development of low-power/low-cost x86 cores (known as “Cats”, e.g., “Bobcat”, Jaguar”, “Puma”) and focus on high-performance scalable micro-architectures instead. Moreover, Mr. Papermaster, who worked on design of microprocessors at IBM from 1991 to 2006, eventually unified all CPU architecture development teams into one, creating a large pool of talent ready to address various challenges.

amd_fusion_semi_custon_chip_universe

Mark Papermaster re-assigned one of the teams (presumably the one located in Boxborough, Massachusetts) to finish the “Bulldozer” micro-architecture enhancements (that work was probably completed in ~2013 and then the team joined the global CPU architecture development group), making resources of the California-based CPU engineering team available to Jim Keller, who joined AMD in August, 2012.

Today, engineers at different locations work on the same projects, which should speed up development of high-performance x86 and ARM cores. For example, people at Fort Collins, Colorado, are working on energy-efficiency of AMD's future micro-architectures (e.g., “Zen”) and chip designs. AMD’s globalized micro-architecture and microprocessor development groups should be generally more agile and flexible than dedicated teams back in the days. As a result, it is logical to expect AMD to create products faster going forward. Moreover, thanks to Jim Keller’s contribution, those chips are expected to be rather competitive on the micro-architecture level.

Fixing CPU development pipeline at AMD was a key thing for the company’s future success. The strategic decision for this was made by Mark Papermaster, who handled a lot of organizational issues too. However, it was Jim Keller, who created a working mechanism that is ready to produce competitive micro-architectures for processors.

Discuss on our Facebook page, HERE.

KitGuru Says: Contemporary microprocessors contain billions of elements. Modern CPU micro-architectures are extremely complex and can only be developed by groups of talented people working together. Nonetheless, Jim Keller is a true legend in the world of microprocessors. Throughout his career, he managed design of so many successful products that without any doubts he is a brilliant CPU architect. It is a little sad to see him leaving AMD, but if you take a look at his career, he has never spent more than several years at one chipmaker. In fact, it was a matter of time for him to leave AMD. Fortunately, there is now a working global CPU micro-architecture development group at AMD, which can continue what Mr. Keller started. The main intrigue about Jim Keller now is what is next for him. Meanwhile, AMD's processor R&D is in good hands for now.

Become a Patron!

Check Also

Leo Says 77 – Intel ‘fesses up about Arrow Lake Core Ultra 200S

The launch of the new Intel Core Ultra 200S family of CPUs along with Z890 motherboards was a thorny process. KitGuru suffered along with pretty much every other review site on the planet and you may have noticed we held off from reviewing of the Core Ultra 9 285K, Core Ultra 7 265K and Core Ultra 5 245K as it is clear to us that Intel has some work to do before this platform is ready for action.

31 comments

  1. Ouch. I really hope this has no effect on Zen/Zen+. Sadly I have a feeling Zen+ may be affected which is bad since I wanted Zen+

  2. Did you even read the article?

  3. All new paying Career: Make $97 Just In One Hour……….Afterg an average of 19952 Dollars monthly,I’m finally getting 97 Dollars an hour,just working 4-5 hours daily online.….. Weekly paycheck… Bonus opportunities…earn upto $6k to $9k /a month… Just few hours of your free time, any kind of computer, elementary understanding of web and stable connection is what is required…….HERE I STARTED…look over here
    —-ymy……
    ➤➤➤➤ http://GoogleTopPayJobsNetworkOnlineCenters/$98hourlywork…. =======================================================

  4. meanwhile, party time in intel HQ–

  5. Yes they are on track for Zen for 2016. But AMD never gave an actual year to expect Zen+. I automatically expected a 2017 release but since Zen is more likely to release late 2016 Zen+ sounds like a late 2017 release at best or even into 2018. In that case who knows. Both development on Zen and Zen+ are done but that doesn’t mean problems will stay away between now and production and release. When a problem occurs the loss of Keller can have an effect. Then there’s the third and fourth iteration of Zen, but that’s way too far down the line to even talk about. What is the point of your post? Be an 4ss hat?

  6. Anton, This was an excellent article! Thank you!

  7. Look at his alias… He’s clearly a MORON who thinks he knows it all…

  8. READ the article again, and again, until the FACTS can penetrate your BONE HEAD and filter down into your monkey brain.

    >>>”The development of “Zen” (znver1) and “Zen+” (znver2) micro-architectures – which AMD has disclosed – has been completed a long time ago. At this point Mr. Keller’s CPU architecture design team may be finalizing the third iteration of Zen (znver3) or starting high-level design of the fourth iteration of Zen (znver4). Development of the “K12” and the “K12+” micro-architectures, which share a lot of innovations with “Zen”, has been finished too. It is highly likely that the departure of Mr. Keller will not significantly affect AMD’s products due in 2016 – 2018, all products based on “Zen” and “K12″ cores will see the light of day.”<<<

  9. so they have their CPU design team all over the world essentially.
    I dont see any issue with that whatsoever.
    except maybe EVERYTHING

    email. From design team 1 (the A team)
    I think we shld fix this and this and this.
    3 days later. we spoke to design team 2, 2b and design team 3. and then we consulted the upper management. who then went to Lisa Su. Lisa Su responded with a grunt, definitely wasn’t in English. But we have been told a grunt noise does mean a “yes” in the cpu manufacturing world.

    3 more days later (6 total)
    we have just been informed Lisa’s answer wasn’t in fact a grunt. it was a gnarl. the grunt was in relation to us selling a part of the company cause we suck.

    The gnarl is a definate NO cause there are no funds.
    please CC all the other teams so they dont send off new wafer templates to cost us another .5 million to redevelop

  10. holy crap thats a sweet deal. How do I get this Job. Hurry please I want to make sure I get the Job. this is too good to pass up!

  11. hulio. you haven’t got back to me. has the position been filled already? 🙁

  12. Allow me to show you a fantastic +ways to earn a lot of extra dollars by finishing basic tasks from your house for few short hours a day — See more info by visiting >MY_DISQUS_PROFILE

  13. Damn they couldn’t keep him? That’s too bad. Zen will be AMD’s last hurrah?

  14. Wait, what? The Zen chip was finished “a long time ago”? Yet the Zen chip will not be in full production until 2017? That means Intel will have over three years of more development time and processor releases from the time that the Zen architecture was finished until AMD finally starts selling the chip. Intel is not someone you want to give any advantage to when it is already such a powerhouse.
    Let’s just say that Zen was taped out late last year. Intel released Broadwell, Devil’s Canyon, and Skylake since then and will have Kaby Lake and be close to 10nm Cannnonlake by the time Zen shows up. In the meantime, AMD is losing market share by the boatload. Even ARM processors could give Zen market share issues by then. AMD, it was good knowing you…

  15. Thank you for nice words!

  16. “he development of “Zen” (znver1) and “Zen+” (znver2) micro-architectures – which AMD has disclosed – has been completed a long time ago. At this point Mr. Keller’s CPU architecture design team may be finalizing the third iteration of Zen (znver3) or starting high-level design of the fourth iteration of Zen (znver4). Development of the “K12” and the “K12+” micro-architectures, which share a lot of innovations with “Zen”, has been finished too. It is highly likely that the departure of Mr. Keller will not significantly affect AMD’s products due in 2016 – 2018, all products based on “Zen” and “K12″ cores will see the light of day.”

    what is the source of this info

  17. Production looks like 16

  18. “Let’s just say that Zen was taped out late last year.”

    What nonsense are you writing? Zen is rumored to be manufactured on 14nm FinFET. How on earth was it taped out late last year and would need another 12 months to come to market?

    Just because Keller left, doesn’t mean Zen is doomed.

    “Intel is not someone you want to give any advantage to when it is already such a powerhouse.”

    Another clueless statement. Intel has nearly 100X the market capitalization of AMD. Anyone expecting a firm 100X smaller with a fraction of the R&D of Intel to beat them in processor design is an idiot. Your statement just underlines your unrealistic expectations. The goal is for AMD to get a solid foundation to build upon for years to come. No one sane expects AMD to beat Intel’s 2016-2018 CPUs. Intel hasn’t even been pressured to release a 6-core i7 at $299 or an 8-core i7 at $399-499. However, as long as AMD delivers on 40% IPC, it can find sales because not everyone is willing to pay Intel’s motherboard/chipset and i7 premiums.

  19. The words TITAN X, GTX, Ti Boost… Seem more luring the big pockets than Zen, R9, HD, Radeon…
    The most revenue comes from the ones that buy after cool names and frequent driver updates.

  20. H23, AMD announced a few days ago that Zen has been delayed to Q4, 2016 due to issues with getting 14nm FinFET working and expects full production to start early 2017.

  21. Doesn’t anyone here read the tech stuff? AMD announced that Zen is delayed until Q4, 2016 with production in 2017.

    http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2015/09/15/can-zen-chips-shield-amd-from-intel-corporations-w.aspx

  22. Are you daft…..Source “AMD” saying anything. It’s all rumors and hearsay, AMD has only said full year revenue 17, and shown Zen on a 16 road map. Also Lisa Su has made comments in last months conference call.

  23. Now there is a reliable source. “The Fury X will be the fastest graphics card on the planet and will be highly overclockable!”
    http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2015/09/15/can-zen-chips-shield-amd-from-intel-corporations-w.aspx

  24. see it’s not AMD you said AMD……it’s digitimes. and there is also rumors that Zen is taped out at TSMC as well for this reason…as GF has pulled this off many times. From all the tech sites…not AMD it seems that Zen is complete…is sampling early 16 if not before and launching sometime in the second half. AMD has not confirmed what my estimates are or what you claimed AMD said.

  25. Anton

    FYI, Ken is posting on the Yahoo AMD message board, http://finance.yahoo.com/mb/AMD/, using his amdtripledigits and other identities. I encourage you to go there and watch him and his attempts to manipulate others with hyperbole, outright lies, about AMD.
    Watch out

  26. http://finance.yahoo.com/mb/AMD/
    Your cover posting as amdtripledigits is blown, Ken. Does your father Meyer know what you are doing?

  27. K8 says hi.

  28. “Yet the Zen chip will not be in full production until 2017?”

    What constitutes full production? For consumers, if the product is on the shelves and we are able to buy it, it’s full production. Full production capacity (i.e., as in maximizing all of the supplier’s ability to mass produce) that’s a different story.

    “Let’s just say that Zen was taped out late last year.”

    Do you have a source for that? How can Zen have been taped out in 2014 when it’s going to be manufactured on high-performance FinFETs? I highly doubt it was possible to produce manufacturing samples of Zen on FF in 2014.

    “Intel released Broadwell, Devil’s Canyon, and Skylake since then and will have Kaby Lake and be close to 10nm Cannnonlake by the time Zen shows up.”

    Kaby Lake is pushed to Q4 2016 and Cannonlake is nowhere in sight for that time-frame. That means Zen’s compeittor will most likely be Kaby-Lake, Broadwell-E and then in 1H of 2017, Skylake-E. A realistic time-frame for Cannonlake is Q3-4 2017.

    Also, despite Intel’s marketing, Kaby Lake is not an all-new architecture. I am not saying it won’t be good but given that Skyake was a flop vs. Haswell, I am not buying Intel’s marketing BS about KL being anything special. If AMD can deliver 6-8 core CPUs with IPC close to IVB, that would be awesome for the consumers.

    With Intel announcing BW-E 10-core and pushing prices on 6-cores even lower (i7 5820K, i7 6800K), everyone who reads tech realizes Zen is unlikely to compete in the upper segments. But Intel’s $50-350 market segments can be attacked. i7 6700K is just a glorified i5. With DX12 there should be less reliance on IPC and more on multi-cores. That means a lot of people would take a 6-8 core CPU with IVB IPC for $350 over an i7 6700K.

    “Even ARM processors could give Zen market share issues by then. AMD, it was good knowing you…”

    How? ARM and x86 do not compete directly. In the mobile/tablet space, ARM is killing everyone, including Intel. A9/A9X, Exynos 8890 will wipe the floor with anything Intel has in perf/watt and price/perf in that space. Not sure why you even brought up ARM considering ARM smashes Intel in the mobile space, nevermind AMD.

  29. hi

  30. By the way AMD has better processor, in multitasking many seems forget that FX8350 is faster then 4790K………..

  31. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/1c8c12f1762a1f211f09a17f3156314882b275720c0044a6f321a0e51bd86970.gif