Home / Channel / Uber faces London court battle today

Uber faces London court battle today

Uber has been facing stiff opposition to its operation almost since it began service several years ago. It's had to deal with violence in some countries, protests from entire working sectors and most recently court battles, where taxi industries attempt to shut it out of their industry. The latest battle faced by the app based transport company will be in London, where Uber will have to deal with Transport for London's interest to implement new rules which could make it impossible for the firm to operate within the British capital.

Uber's entire service is built around convenience and speed, whereby a customer can find a hire car – of admittedly dubious qualification – within minutes, rather than hailing a taxi or calling a related firm. That's something that won't be possible under proposed TfL laws, which would introduce a mandatory minimum five minute wait time between hailing a vehicle and actually getting into it, as well as a ban on calling for a car using an application.

Now the high court will decide whether such measures are warranted or indeed fair. While they would certainly favour traditional taxis, placing those sorts of restrictions would inhibit innovation and make it so that the already operating taxi companies are unable to bring about faster services for their customers in the future, or indeed attempt to link up with them using a simplistic application.

uberlondon
It can't be that bad, Uber is still advertising for more London based drivers

This has been the problem faced by Uber all over the world, in various markets. While taxi drivers certainly face stiff competition from their service, that is often because they are unable to compete legitimately due to heavy licensing costs and a lack of technological advancement in their businesses. It's hoped by some that even if Uber is restricted in some countries it will at least encourage a lifting on transport company restrictions to help modernise many aspects of the industry.

Uber remains confident it can continue to operate within London though, with one spokesperson saying that any ruling “would not affect Uber’s license in London, or its ability to operate here.” It's not exactly clear how that could happen, but it is thought that Uber may be able to circumvent any negative ruling with a few changes to how its application works.

Discuss on our Facebook page, HERE.

KitGuru Says: Instead of trying to shut Uber down, I'd much rather the taxi companies had their restrictions lifted a little to make it so that they could compete more evenly. Shutting down innovation for the sake of maintaining a status quo is silly. 

Become a Patron!

Check Also

EKWB Whistleblower Dan Henderson speaks to KitGuru

Following on from our recent interview with EKWB's CEO, Leo is now getting the other side of the story, straight from Dan Henderson himself, the one who initially acted as the 'whistleblower' for EKWB's internal issues.

8 comments

  1. Hope it gets banned

  2. If the Taxi services do not like Uber then they need to compete and make a better service, obviously people want a service like Uber so why don’t the taxi services just make an app of their own for the same purpose ?

    The world is changing and the phrase “we have always done it like this” needs to disappear permanently.

    Innovation not Stagnation.

  3. why ?

  4. It just goes to show the ridiculous power the unions still wield in this country. When laws are made in the interests of preserving the status quo so unskilled workers can enjoy the same standard of living, as opposed to actually improving services, then I think we really need to question the amount of political influence unions should be allowed to have.

  5. Fair Competition :)

    You’d have thought that with a name like fair market you’d be up for a bit of fair competition. This will force the taxi companies to diversify and create a better service.

  6. Both black cabs and mini cabs already have apps that are equally as good as ubers.The argument is if uber should ever have been licences.,not only that,do we need another parasitic operator who pay little in taxes.

  7. That is a fair question, as far as taxes go, I believe that if you do business in the uk you should pay tax in the uk no matter where your european head office is *cough Amazon cough*.

  8. Exactly,problem is those that are championing ubers cause are the same people that think it’s outrageous that these companies,bankrolled by the vampire squids,ie Goldman Sachs, and Google should all pay billions more in taxes.Their aim is to trample all opposition into the ground,and when the job is done we’ll end up with a low wage,second rate taxi service,job done.