Home / Component / SSD Drives / Seagate one-ups Samsung with a 60TB SSD

Seagate one-ups Samsung with a 60TB SSD

Just recently, Samsung’s massive 15.6TB SSD began selling at retailers for $10,000. The 15TB drive was impressive at the time, but now it looks like Seagate is stealing the limelight with the announcement of its 60TB SSD.

Seagate showed off its massive SSD at the Flash Memory Summit this week, though it was only there for demonstration purposes, so it isn’t really a full-blown product just yet and likely still needs some work.

seagate-sas-ssd

Image source: Slashgear

As PCworld points out, if Seagate can deliver on this, then its SSD would be four times larger than the current largest SSD in the world, Samsung’s PM1633a, the $10,000 15TB drive. Much like Samsung’s offering, the Seagate 60TB SSD is a SAS drive in a 3.5-inch form factor. It isn’t really for consumer use but would work well for server use, where you can double down on mass storage and save on rack space.

The exciting part is that this drive is based on a “flexible architecture” and could end up scaling to support 100TB of storage in the same form factor, according to the official announcement.

Discuss on our Facebook page, HERE.

KitGuru Says: There have been a lot of developments in the SSD world recently. I thought 15TB of space on the Samsung drive was impressive but 60TB just blows that out of the water and the potential for up to 100TB of space on Seagate’s drive is really pushing the envelope.

Become a Patron!

Check Also

Teamgroup introduces new PCIe 5.0 SSDs

Team Group's gaming brand, T-Force, has unveiled its latest PCIe 5.0 SSD series named GA …

6 comments

  1. how much 2 million

  2. <<hp. ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★::::::!ir265m:….,….

  3. not-a-fanboi-honest

    Now Samsung has one upped Seagate by announcing 32TB 2.5″. So two of those = 64TB in less space than a 3.5″. Nice.

    All we need now is the prices to drop by around 10x. 😉

  4. WINvidia or AMDream

    2.5″ + 2.5″ = 5″…. Maybe you need to recheck your math, but that also means 44.8TB in a 3.5″ not 64TB. Samsung has not one upped Seagate yet. =)

  5. 2.5″ is not the thickness you idiot

  6. not-a-fanboi-honest

    As Alex points out, it’s the VOLUME, you can physically put 2 x 2.5″ drives in the same space as 1 x 3.5″.

    2 x 32 = 64 the last time I checked …