Home / Software & Gaming / Do you think online game universes should be preserved?

Do you think online game universes should be preserved?

With the news doing the rounds this morning that Blizzard won't be making any big announcements about legacy World of Warcraft servers at Blizzcon, we'd like to ask you the question: Do you think classic MMO universes should be preserved? If so, would you pay for the privilege?

One of the best aspect of contemporary, especially online, gaming, is that they are inter connected and have much more multi-player functionality than games of yesteryear. However anything that requires online servers and can't retain a solid population base to pay for its upkeep, is destined to one day be tossed to the wayside.

This means that persistent online worlds, be they for a small, shared online experience, or something much grander like an MMO, reach a point and then are destroyed. Whether we're talking about the recent vanilla WoW server, Nostalrius, Microsoft's Project Spark or as many as 50 different EA games all at once. And this is just from the past few years, in the last two decades, we've seen countless MMOs and online worlds disappear for good.

nostalriusend

MMO fans have often gathered in huge numbers during final server shut downs. Source: Oeddelino/Youtube

What about City of Heroes or Warhammer Online? Star Wars Galaxies? Shadowbane? The Matrix Online? These are all worlds that no longer exist in their official guise. These are worlds that apart from the odd limited fan-project, no longer exist. But should they?

With the thousands of people who have clamoured for Blizzard to deliver a legacy, vanilla version of Azeroth for them to play on, surely there's a place for some of these worlds? Of course the problem with running these severs, indeed the reason they don't exist in an official guise any more, is a lack of funds. Paying to run servers isn't cheap, especially with thousands or even tens of thousands of players. Paying for admin and community leaders isn't cheap either.

But perhaps there should be something. Even a frozen snapshot of a world with zero interaction, that you can merely explore and look at. Like a photo of a bygone era. Something from these worlds should survive, something more than screengrabs and videos.

Discuss on our Facebook page, HERE.

KitGuru Says: Do you think we should be trying to find a way to preserve the online worlds we have all spent so much time enjoying? 

Become a Patron!

Check Also

Omni-movement DOOM

KitGuru Games: Omni-movement culminates 30 years of FPS innovation

Black Ops 6 is officially here, bringing the innovative new Omni-movement system to the game. While on the surface a relatively simple change, I argue that Treyarch intimately studied DOOM and the past 30 years of first-person shooter evolution to craft one of the most satisfying gameplay systems yet.

2 comments

  1. If the original company isn’t going to maintain a server, then they should at least allow private servers.

  2. I make a distinction between an abandoned game and an active one. I don’t think that a company should be required to maintain (or let others maintain) older copies of a game, even if people liked these versions. It’s up to the company to decide who to appeal to.

    Dead games, I’d like to see them, but for many of them that would be a licensing problem. Star Wars, Warhammer, Matrix, etc., are all licenses that I’m sure will cost more than third parties who want to run servers will be able to pay.

    So all we’re left with are a few custom IP’s, like City of Heroes, and for that yes, I’d love to see IP laws that allow running such games by third parties.