KitGuru KitGuru.net – Tech News | Hardware News | Hardware Reviews | IOS | Mobile | Gaming | Graphics Cards
It seems more and more likely that Microsoft will release a new cheap, portable, device running a Cloud-based version of Windows, in time for the next back-to-school shopping season.
It's been a busy 12 months for Microsoft. Early on we heard Windows running on Qualcomm's Snapdragon hardware. Even a trial test at Xiaomi that allowed users to install Windows on their Android phones. Then we heard mumblings of an upcoming Cloud-based version of Windows. More recently we've been hit with rumours of new Microsoft hardware such as the Surface Pro 5 and a major education event booked for May 2nd.
It turns out that all of it might be just about one major device launch, a Chromebook-killer tentatively monikered the ‘Cloudbook' (although we doubt this is a real name, as Cloudbook is already a series of Acer devices).
According to the latest reports, the ‘Cloudbook' will be using a Snapdragon 835 SoC from Qualcomm, like the one used on the Xiaomi 6 or Xperia XZ Premium. The tiny Snapdragon 835 includes an Adreno 540 GPU (claimed to be 25% faster than its predecessors), octa-core Kryo 280 big.LITTLE CPU at up to 2.45 GHz, Snapdragon X16 LTE modem (1 Gbps peak download) for wireless communications and possibly more important for head-in-the-cloud teens… Quick Charge 4.0, which Qualcomm claims to deliver 5 hours of power for 5 mins of charging.
Apparently, Microsoft may have clued-up to the fact that there is money to be made by releasing its own version of a lightweight, inexpensive laptop device, which will stave off the Chrome OS juggernaut. Recent research from Futuresource Consulting, shows that Chromebooks have massively eroded Apple's share of K12 sales in the US, rising from 38% market share in 2014 to 58% market share in 2016, almost exclusively at the cost of Apple's iOS (i.e. iPads) and OS X (i.e. MacBooks). If Microsoft does nothing, it'll be next.
KitGuru Says: We've grown accustomed to seeing Microsoft as the “OS company”, but that picture has been changing in recent years with the Surface family of devices. There is no reason Microsoft cannot pull this off, if it really fields such a device.
if the price is right, below 200 euros, then maybe, just maybe, it will be interesting.
Otherwise there are already cheap windows laptops at this price range that while they are limited in hardware, they are still full blown x86 machines.
I would be more interested in better for a remote connection system between a laptop and a desktop, the Windows Remote connect system is good but it would be better with built in features for smoothing out time periods of low device to device bandwidth
Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family! !mj209d:
On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
!mj209d:
➽➽
➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash209HomeTalkGetPay$97Hour… ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★:::::!mj209d..,..
Bye Chromebooks and Google docs, bye iPad and Pages/Keynote
They both had their chance, time to move aside DOJ restrictions are over.
Managing director of Google!, is explaining to users to start off “Work at home” method, that People have been doing for about one year now. These days alone, I generated close to $36,000 until now with no more than my home computer as well as some spare time, despite that i have a fulltime 9 to 5 job. Even everyone not used to this, can make $89/per h easily and the earnings can go even higher over time… This is how i started
!wr336c:
➽➽
➽➽➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialCashJobs336TopCloud/GetPaid$97/Hour… ★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫:::!wr336u:………
no female spambot, first it is because that URL says GetPaid$97, second of all by simple math you are working on an average of 1.1 hours a day, there is not a single job that is so vital at Google to command such high hourly pay with so few hours, this would be a 178.8K job full time