It doesn’t matter how good any of the synthetic suites are, the real meat of the testing has to be under absolute real world conditions. This proves difficult as to record results we have to narrow down fluctuation. Therefore while we would say these are the most useful results to get from this review, there is always going to be a slight margin for error – its not absolutely scientific.
Firstly we installed a fresh copy of Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit Edition onto each of the drives and performed a clean update from Microsoft with all patches and security fixes. We then install a basic suite of software, such as Office, Firefox and Adobe Design, then we install AVG free antivirus. We used a digital watch for this startup and repeated the test five times for each drive – once we had these five results we averaged the results and took that for the final figure.
Very good results indeed, consistently mirroring the same time as the other Sandforce 240GB drives on test today.
Not quite as quick as the larger 240GB MAX IOPS drive with this particular level load, but the differences are negligible in the real world.
Excellent, these drives have been getting rave reviews. Seem slightly overpriced as the review says. perhaps they will drop a little more
£80 extra when compared to the ordinary 2281 powered OCZ drives, is too much to pay. I do agree, if the price hits £200 then its an excellent choice due to ultimate speeds, especially sequentual !
Very nice indded. I need to snag an ssd soon for my laptop
Bit expensive. Our local store has a 120gb vertex 3 for 145 inc
The problem in the toshiba nand, its mega costly
Ocz for me, they update their firmwares all the time, which is very important