Home / Tech News / Featured Tech Reviews / OCZ Vertex 450 256GB Review

OCZ Vertex 450 256GB Review

ACC_1653_DxO
OCZ box artwork is generally very good and the Vertex 450 drive is presented in a flat, fairly large box with a high resolution image of the drive on the front and some specifications below.
ACC_1655_DxO
The bundle includes a user manual. a ‘I love my OCZ SSD' sticker, mounting screws with a branded 3.5 inch converter bay.
ACC_1657_DxOACC_1660_DxO
The Vertex 450 ships in a heavy aluminium enclosure, sealed with screws at the front (under the sticker) and at the back. If you open the drive you will lose warranty, so we recommend you don't attempt it. That is why we are here after all.
ACC_1663_DxOACC_1661_DxO
Barefoot3-M10-diagram
The Vertex 450 uses a lower clocked ARM Cortex processor paired up with an OCZ Aragon co-processor that when combined push the data through a SATA 6Gbps interface. They also power the 256 bit compliant encryption, wear levelling algorithm pieces and AES compliant encryption. The DDR3 cache is accessed via the DRAM controller and the communication with the NAND is handled across 8 parallel channels.

The flash modules on the PCB are Micron branded IMFT 20nm MLC. There are sixteen on the PCB with a density of 16GB each. This gives a total of 256GB. Previous drives we have reviewed have adopted 25nm lithography NAND.

There are two cache chips, one of them is placed on each side of the PCB, they are 256MB each and are manufactured by Micron. The Indilinx controller can also be seen in the images above, we removed the thermal pad. This controller is marked IDX500M10-BC and is a different naming from the controller in the Vector drives (IDX500M00-BC). The firmware has been adjusted to support the new NAND.

While the Sandforce controllers were frequently in the news for failures and issues, we haven't read any problems yet with the latest OCZ Indilinx controlled drives.

Become a Patron!

Check Also

Tryx Luca L70 Case Review – needs a lot more work

The Tryx Luca L70 had some negative press at launch but is it really that bad?

5 comments

  1. An excellent drive, ive been waiting on one for a while now. still not stock here!

  2. They need to lower the price a little more I think against Samsung drives to get more market share. I know a lot of people just look at the best price and buy based on that.

  3. I would have a problem trusting OCZ. I had 2 of their sandforce powered drives fail, luckily OCUK replaced them for me, but they tend to rush things out before completely checking them. just my 2 cents

  4. Agreed that some of them were faulty, But It is not ethical to target the controllers and we need to change the perception that all drives having SF controller would fail.