KitGuru KitGuru.net – Tech News | Hardware News | Hardware Reviews | IOS | Mobile | Gaming | Graphics Cards
It doesn’t matter how good any of the synthetic suites are, the real meat of the testing has to be under absolute real world conditions. This proves difficult as to record results we have to narrow down fluctuation. Therefore while we would say these are the most useful results to get from this review, there is always going to be a slight margin for error – its not absolutely scientific.
Firstly we installed a fresh copy of Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit Edition onto each of the drives, no programs were installed, just the operating system and a clean update from Microsoft with all patches and security fixes. The machine was then shut down and once started up we recorded boot times – until we reached a working desktop. We used a digital watch for this and repeated the test five times for each drive – once we had these five results we averaged the results and took that for the final figure. We also included a standard £70 Western Digital 1TB hard drive for comparison purposes.
This is the first OCZ drive to beat the Intel X25-M 160GB in our boot test, even if it is by only half a second. The single OCZ drive is only 1.5 seconds behind the Raid 0 X25 V configuration which is an incredible result.
Snow Leopard 10.6.4 Boot Times
Not everyone uses Windows 7, and although TRIM is only supported by this Operating system, I like to expand results a little when possible. I therefore used my Macintosh MacBook pro 17 inch, Generation 5.1 which is based around a 2.93ghz Core 2 Duo processor with 9600m graphics. There is 8GB of DDR3 ram in this machine with a full 3 Gigabit link speed over the nVidia MCP79 AHCI. I also enabled the full 64bit Kernel and Extensions – if you want to read more, check out this article.
The OCZ Agility 2 120GB performs exactly the same under OSX as the Vertex 2 did under our test conditions. This is only half a second slower than the Crucial C300, but it is worth pointing out that our Macintosh does not have a full SATA 600 connection meaning it is limited to the controller bandwidth.
OCZ SSD’s are great 🙂 seems like another winner.
I love the sandforce controller, even though it doesnt often translate into a much better ‘real world’ scenario when compared to say intels units. good balanced performer and ideal for database workers.
OCZ dont make a bad SSD, this seems to be a good followup to the original unit.
I think the 40GB units are ideal for boot drives, as long as you have a mechanical drive at hand for storage. I like the look of the new Corsair F40, at under 100 quid.
Very good units these, well made, and pricing isnt too bad. I agree though, two 40gb SSDs in raid 0, seems cheaper and faster. id like to see a review of the new 40GB SSDs
So many companies using sandforce controllers now, they all seem to handle much the same. still, good drive.
The biggest issue for sandforce right now is the marvell/crucial partnership. that controller is more advanced, and the only thing against it is the fact that most motherboards dont have sata 600 ports, and even those who do are crap. you need a dedicated 600 sata controller for optimum performance.
I still find them too expensive. a few good 1TB mechanical drives in raid 0, partitioned to say 300gb boot and 1.7 storage, is pretty good and also fast enough for most people.
Bill, while I understand what you are saying, you really do need to actually use a good, new modern SSD, they are much faster, not just with throughput, but with accessing. they make brilliant boot drives, no doubt about it.
Thanks for the great review zardon.
I want more SSD reviews however, there are so many out there. how about Crucial 128GB REALSSD (256 you reviewed costs too much) and maybe some of the new Corsair sandforce range.
Do OCZ not make a 40GB SSD? I couldnt find any online, I see intels and corsairs.
Hello, we will be looking at many more SSDS over the coming months, we have many in our offices right now and more reviews are forthcoming.
OCZ do make small drives by the way, such as the 30GB vertex which is just over 75 in the UK right now.
Good performers, sandforce is a very good performing controller, class leader in sata 300.
Very nice unit, I had been looking at picking one of these up for a while now.
I would love these to drop to under 200 quid. once you break that point it gets so hard to justify.
Its either one of these, or a crucial REALSSD 128GB. so hard to decide!
Last year I would have bought OCZ immediately. This is a great drive, but the competition is high, I agree. hard to know which to go for. I think if you need high write speeds the sandforce are good, but intel are great with reading and crucial’s are in another league, but only if you have the right controller for it.
Any Sandforce drive is nice and that a monster of a review! Great work!