Home / Tech News / Featured Tech Reviews / Intel SSD 750 Series 1.2TB PCIe NVMe Review

Intel SSD 750 Series 1.2TB PCIe NVMe Review

The Intel SSD 750 Series drive is a particularly high performance solution that brings an ultra-fast PCIe connection and the NVMe specification to consumer markets.

Intel's focus on read performance indicates their consumer target audience. Sequential read speeds were as high as 2.6GBps for large file transfers, while 4K random read performance with a large queue depth delivered more than 460,000 IOPS. Even with a smaller queue depth, the SSD 750's 4K random read performance neared 200,000 IOPS.

Write speeds are not as aggressive as those for read. Large transfers showed sequential write speeds as high as 1300MBps, while 4K random write testing with a large queue depth showed just over 310,000 IOPS. A smaller queue depth pulled random write performance down to a 143,000 IOPS level, at which point multi-drive RAID 0 SSD solutions are quicker.

We tested out Battlefield 4 launch and loading times and found very little (too small to accurately differentiate with a stopwatch) advantage for the SSD 750 drive. The benefits of significantly higher-speed storage devices are unlikely to show widespread advantages in games until the developers start making better use of the speed.

On the consumer market, there is nothing that matches the read performance of Intel's SSD 750 1.2TB drive. Whether your data is compressible or not, or if your workload consists of varied file sizes, the drive's read performance is superb. Write performance, however, is typically bettered by the PCIe SSDs that we are used to seeing – which consist of multiple SATA-based drives in RAID 0.

Main-Image-650-2

With its read performance levels, the Intel SSD 750 drive could be useful for users whose working requirements include high-resolution content editing or manipulating large engineering models. Put simply, the Intel SSD 750 is an excellent drive for users who need high read performance to cash their end-of-month pay-cheque. If your workload is based around writing, Intel's SSD 750 may not be the outright best solution.

Intel tells us that suggested pricing for the SSD 750 drives is $389 (probably around £300-350) for the 400GB version and $1029 (probably around £800-900) for the 1.2TB capacity. There should not be a price difference between the 2.5″ or AIC form factors.

Edit: Overclockers UK have the 400GB version on pre-order for £369.98 and the 1.2TB version at £969.98.

At just under $1/GB for the 400GB drive and around $0.84/GB for the 1.2TB version, these drives certainly aren't cheap. That said, many of the multi-drive RAID 0 PCIe SSDs have long dictated price points towards and above the $1/GB level, but Intel's SSD 750 comfortably outperforms them in read-heavy workloads. And the SSD 750's pricing is significantly lower than professional solutions.

Intel's SSD 750 Series drive shows levels of performance that we have yet to see on the consumer storage market at a somewhat affordable price point. While it may not be the fastest consumer drive for write operations, read performance is outstanding. And Intel's adoption of the PCIe interface and NVMe specification is also worthy of credit.

Discuss on our Facebook page, over HERE.

Pros:

  • Ultra-fast sequential speeds, especially for reads.
  • Very high 4K random performance, especially for reads.
  • Support for boot with X99 and Z97 motherboards.
  • High endurance rating and 5 year warranty.
  • Can be considered competitively-priced, given the performance levels.

Cons:

  • Some other drives offer higher write performance in certain workloads.
  • Give enthusiasts a capacity between 400GB and 1.2TB, as well as a black PCB/backplate.

KitGuru says: A performance king for the consumer SSD market. If your workloads demand serious read performance, Intel's NVMe-based SSD 750 Series drives are a strong choice.

MUST-HAVE2-300x300

 

Become a Patron!

Rating: 9.0.

Check Also

Tryx Luca L70 Case Review – needs a lot more work

The Tryx Luca L70 had some negative press at launch but is it really that bad?

12 comments

  1. Looks great! As per with all the new stuff… Not keen on the price! Ha But absolutely do want!

  2. Looks great! As per with all the new stuff… Not keen on the price! Ha But absolutely do want!

  3. ♋♪♪♪♪♋86$ PER HOUℛ@ai5:

    Going Here you
    Can Find Out,,

    ►►►► ::>>http://WorkOnlineMag.com/get/position

    ✸✸✸✸✸✸✸✸✸✸✸✸✸✸✸✸✸✸✸✸✸✸✸✸✸✸✸✸✸✸✸

  4. Hi Norbs,

    There are some enthusiasts who stand by backplates on any expansion card they use. When dropping more than £300 or £800 on an SSD, a black backplate worth tens of pennies is not too much to ask for.

    A metal backplate would also conduct heat away from the rear-mounted NAND packages, so its function is more than to prevent ‘severe clashing with one’s system’.

    Luke

  5. I just would refrain from listing it as a CON of the card; it’s performance speaks for itself. Most datacenter grade pcie cards don’t have any type of backplates. Only reason I’d agree with you would be to simply protect the NAND because
    I’m pretty sure intel did their due diligence to make sure that card
    does not need cooling on those NAND chips.

  6. I think it’s fair to call it a con; many enthusiasts will want a backplate but the drive doesn’t have one. To many people, buying a piece of computer hardware is about more than just the performance (whether or not other people agree with that mindset). As we can see though, it is a clearly a minor ‘con’, hence why it’s tied in with the point for an intermediate capacity. I would be surprised if anybody chose not to buy it solely for lacking a backplate, but they may attempt a mod to make it look better in their system.

    I agree that the NAND packages on the rear are unlikely to *need* cooling from a backplate – they are relatively low capacity (lower number of dies). Most people value a backplate for aesthetics although there are arguments for structural rigidity and cooling, whether or not they are actually required by the drive.

    I just pointed out the lack of backplate as a con. If you personally don’t see it as a con then that’s completely fine and it can be ignored.

    Luke

  7. Why get this when you can get the Samsung SM951. Sure the SM951 is AHCI not NVMe, but 2.0 GB/s is insane regardless. On top of that, I believe it’s less expensive, and it’s nice and small due to it being M.2, therefore leaving room for your 2 or 3 GPUs, soundcard, or whatever. Plus, I’m sure Samsung will make a more consumer-ish / less OEM-ish version of the SM951 soon which I’m guessing will be NVMe, but now I’m just speculating. Anyways, Samsung SM951 all the way.

  8. The intel kills the SM951 on iops… depends on what you are using it for and too was trying to decide which to buy. On one hand the intel 750 will perform better while on the other hand I can use the SM951 in a laptop or other device later. I also tried to see if I can even get my hands on the 512GB SM951 and the best I could do was a site that had it backordered until october 2015.

    Then again the SM951 doesn’t come with a back-plate “for enthusiasts” lmao.

  9. I agree with you, no backplate is almost a deal breaker for me

  10. Now, I just need to win Euromillions and I will get one haha. Just kidding, I don’t have any luck…

  11. dfyt . true that Patricia `s report is impossible… on wednesday I bought Saab 99 Turbo since I been making $8569 thiss month and also ten/k this past month

    . it’s actualy my favourite-work I’ve had . I began this three months/ago and pretty much straight away was earning more than $75… p/h . you could try here HERE’S MORE DETAIL

  12. Too funny, I just saw this drive on newegg and it seems as if the final retail version actually includes a backplate.