Home / Component / SSD Drives / 27% of SSD owners experienced malfunction of SSDs – study

27% of SSD owners experienced malfunction of SSDs – study

Kroll Ontrack, a leading provider of data recovery services, revealed this week that while there are a lot of people who already take advantage of solid-state drives, many of them also have experienced failures of such drives and data loss. Apparently, the amount of people, who suffered an SSD malfunction is rather high.

In the U.K., 27 per cent of respondents of Kroll’s survey had experienced a failure of their SSD and of these 56 per cent experienced data loss as a result. Only 26 per cent were able to recover their data following a failure. It should be noted that many people use older SSDs, which are reaching their end-of-life, therefore, it is not surprising that many of those SSDs are failing. Unfortunately, it is pretty hard to recover data from solid-state drives.

“In the case of SSD technology, data resides in a more scattered format on the drive as compared to traditional hard drive media where data is stored more linearly, adding complexity to SSD data recovery scenarios,” said Paul Le Messurier, programme and operations manager at Kroll Ontrack. “Further, although consolidation in the SSD industry is occurring, data layout and organisation on SSD mediums are still not standardised, driving the need for custom recovery solutions based on the specific manufacturer and model of the device.

seagate_ssd_3

Of about two thousand survey respondents, over 75 per cent use SSD technology in laptop and/or mobile devices, 60 per cent in desktop computers and about 20 per cent in server environments. The survey unsurprisingly found that the majority of SSD owners praise performance of solid-state drives and only 10 per cent note reliability and energy-efficiently.

While it is clear that SSDs cannot be damaged as easily as traditional hard disk drives, they can failure because of other reasons, including imperfections of controllers and NAND flash management as well as malfunction of memory itself.

“SSD technology provides exceptional speed and performance benefits when managing and working within large data environments, and organisations are taking advantage,” said said Mr. Le Messurier. “Despite the many benefits of SSD technology – including reliability – data loss continues to impact SSD devices, just like any other storage device.”

Discuss on our Facebook page, HERE.

KitGuru Says: While it is obvious that SSDs are not perfectly reliable, it is surprising how unreliable older SSDs can be.

Become a Patron!

Check Also

Klevv GENUINE G560 2TB Gen5.0 SSD Review

«Page 1Page 2Page 3Page 4Page 5Page 6Page 7Page 8Page 9Page 10Page 11Page 12Page 13Page 14Page …

8 comments

  1. LOL I RMAed my Intel 520 series 60 GB SSD 3 times within 3 years time !! SSD’s are nowhere reliable compared to proven HDD. Due to being unreliable, SSD can only be used as a boot OS drive than storing important files.

  2. I think we have OCZ to thank for that high figure……
    Some of their models had above 30% failure rates…..
    Today SSD’s are as reliable if not more so than spinning rust…………………………….

  3. I have a Samsung 840 series 250GB SSD and i have experience no issues with data loss or drive failures, i have experienced some of the drive slow down that has been mentioned for Samsung SSDs, but my drive is nearly full so i expected a little speed loss.

    Overall i am extremely happy with my SSD, booting to a fully working windows desktop in 5 seconds is amazing and being able to load BF4 conquest large maps in 15 seconds opposed to waiting nearly 90 second from my old HDD is good too.

  4. I use a samsung 840 pro 256 GB for the boot and games drives, storage is on a sata and backups to sata outside of the pc. Love the 5 second boot and then the pc is ready to go. having 2 ssd’s means it works really well and the worst case scenario is that I need a new boot drive in a few years. not going back to slow sata boot times 🙂

  5. I have 2 X Crucial M4 128 (M4-CT128M4SSD2) in RAID0 with over 14 000 hours on them and not a single issue for that last 3 years. I’m running those on a modified Intel OROM BIOS on a Z68 motherboard. (original Intel OROM didn’t enable TRIM in RAID0 SSD on Z68). Crystal Disk info 6.3.0 report them as *STILL* 98% good!

    I’m still benchmarking 893MB/s seq read, 765MB/s 512K read and 434MB/s 4K QD32 read in Crystal disk mark 3.0.1 on Intel RST driver 11.7.4.1001. That’s with the C: partition 80% full! No slow down here!

  6. I wonder if that issue with TRIM affects all Z68 motherboards.

  7. As far as I know, yes, and I don’t see any reason why it shouldn’t be the case.

  8. I was using Kingstons HyperX SSD and I had data loss for 2 times. So I had to change the ssd to sandisks.. I had no choice.. the intels one was out of stock