Home / Tech News / Featured Tech Reviews / SilverStone Strider Titanium 1100W PSU Review

SilverStone Strider Titanium 1100W PSU Review

To learn more about our PSU tests and methodology, please check out How We Test Power Supply Units.

Primary Rails And 5VSB Load Regulation

Load Regulation testing is detailed here.

Hold-Up Time

Our hold-up time tests are described in detail here.

The oscilloscope screenshots that we took during the hold-up time measurements:

The hold-up time is much lower than 17ms and to make matters even worse, the power ok signal is inaccurate. We don't want to see a “fake” power ok signal in any PSU, especially a high-end one. SilverStone should coordinate with Enhance Electronics and fix this problem – the sooner the better.

Inrush Current

For details on our inrush current testing, please click here.

The inrush current is at normal levels, given the platform's capacity, with both voltage inputs,

Load Regulation And Efficiency Measurements

The first set of tests reveals the stability of the voltage rails and the ST1100-TI’s efficiency. The applied load equals (approximately) 10 to 110 percent of the power supplies maximum load in increments of 10 percentage points.

We conducted two additional tests. During the first, we stressed the two minor rails (5V and 3.3V) with a high load, while the load at +12V was only 0.1A. This test reveals whether a power supply is compatible with Intel’s C6/C7 sleep states or not. In the second test, we determined the maximum load the +12V rail could handle with minimal load on the minor rails.

Test # 12V 5V 3.3V 5VSB DC/AC (Watts) Efficiency Fan Speed (RPM) PSU Noise (dB[A]) Temps (In/Out) PF/AC Volts
1 7.258A 1.975A 1.980A 0.996A 109.808 91.080% 0 <6.0 41.94°C 0.946
12.156V 5.058V 3.328V 5.021V 120.562 38.41°C 115.05V
2 15.551A 2.971A 2.985A 1.196A 219.649 93.170% 980 27.9 38.45°C 0.975
12.139V 5.047V 3.316V 5.002V 235.750 42.15°C 115.07V
3 24.225A 3.476A 3.505A 1.401A 329.790 93.798% 980 27.9 38.58°C 0.983
12.124V 5.036V 3.308V 4.987V 351.595 42.45°C 115.07V
4 32.900A 3.975A 4.001A 1.606A 439.553 93.660% 980 27.9 39.16°C 0.988
12.109V 5.028V 3.298V 4.972V 469.308 43.42°C 115.08V
5 41.264A 4.983A 5.017A 1.815A 549.537 93.264% 1074 30.5 39.54°C 0.990
12.094V 5.018V 3.287V 4.956V 589.226 44.29°C 115.08V
6 49.653A 5.993A 6.040A 2.020A 659.481 91.735% 2040 45.8 40.36°C 0.992
12.078V 5.007V 3.276V 4.940V 718.894 45.52°C 115.09V
7 58.048A 7.012A 7.073A 2.231A 769.387 91.252% 2240 48.7 41.40°C 0.992
12.064V 4.994V 3.265V 4.924V 843.146 47.16°C 115.08V
8 66.429A 8.030A 8.112A 2.445A 879.271 90.933% 2275 49.0 42.37°C 0.992
12.056V 4.983V 3.254V 4.905V 966.943 48.60°C 115.09V
9 75.199A 8.546A 8.656A 2.446A 989.321 90.486% 2283 49.1 44.00°C 0.991
12.058V 4.974V 3.244V 4.899V 1093.344 50.73°C 115.08V
10 83.659A 9.065A 9.177A 3.094A 1099.202 90.046% 2283 49.1 45.58°C 0.993
12.067V 4.967V 3.235V 4.840V 1220.714 52.61°C 115.13V
11 95.192A 9.076A 9.199A 3.091A 1199.326 88.725% 2250 48.8 47.77°C 0.993
11.657V 4.958V 3.227V 4.849V 1351.729 54.99°C 115.16V
CL1 0.099A 14.027A 14.004A 0.004A 117.222 84.099% 2275 49.0 44.47°C 0.957
12.157V 5.002V 3.273V 5.060V 139.386 48.69°C 115.10V
CL2 91.596A 1.004A 1.002A 1.002A 1120.768 90.348% 2283 49.1 47.07°C 0.993
12.091V 5.005V 3.276V 4.963V 1240.499 52.14°C 115.17V

With 110% load, where we push the power supply beyond its official limits, the +12V rail's load regulation gets ugly. The huge voltage drop is a clear indication that 95.2A of current on this rail is way too much. Although we exceed the platform's capabilities, as we already stated, we still expected it to easily handle a 110% overload, like the majority of similar capacity units.

If you don't exceed its max current output, the +12V rail offers tight enough load regulation, while the minor rails fail to impress since several of the competing offerings perform better. Obviously, Enhance Electronics in its effort to achieve the highest possible efficiency, didn't pay much attention on the performance of the minor rails. Speaking of efficiency, the unit manages to meet three out of the four 80 PLUS Titanium requirements, even at the very high ambient temperature that we apply.

Up to the fifth load test the fan spins at low speeds, offering silent operation. During test #6 the cooling fan suddenly gets crazy and doubles its speed with the acoustics noise reaching 46 dB(A), which is very loud. But it gets even louder at higher loads, at close to 49 db(A). We don't expect a 1.1kW power supply to be whisper quiet, but we don't want to encounter such high noise output either, once it comes under high load.

Become a Patron!

Check Also

Tryx Luca L70 Case Review – needs a lot more work

The Tryx Luca L70 had some negative press at launch but is it really that bad?