KitGuru KitGuru.net – Tech News | Hardware News | Hardware Reviews | IOS | Mobile | Gaming | Graphics Cards
The Gigabyte Z270X-Ultra Gaming happily achieved 4.9GHz, 49 x 100, at 1.375 volts using a high Load Line Calibration to maintain voltage stability. The system would not boot at all at 5 or 5.1GHz, where the ASUS Maximus IX Formula would, nonetheless, both motherboards were only benchmark stable at the same final frequency of 4.9GHz.
3600MHz XMP Memory:
We test the motherboard's ability to run G.Skill's high-speed 16GB DDR4 Trident Z kit at a 3600MHz XMP setting. High-speed XMP settings can prove a challenge for motherboard designers when optimising the settings for stability at the intended DRAM frequency.
High speed memory was not an issue either for the Gigabyte motherboard, it happily handled the XMP 3600MHz profile of our G.Skill Trident Z 16GB (2 x 8GB) memory kit.
Overclocked Performance
As a performance comparison, we have included the results from one other Z270 motherboard. The maximum overclocked configuration achieved with each board was a 4900MHz (49 x 100MHz) processor frequency whilst using 3200MHz CL16 memory.
Overclocked performance appropriately reflected the CPU frequency achieved.
Power
We leave the system to idle on the Windows 10 desktop for 5 minutes before taking a reading. For CPU load results we run AIDA64 CPU, FPU, and Cache stress tests and take a reading. The power consumption of our entire test system (at the wall) is shown in the chart.
As mentioned in the UEFI section of this review Gigabyte's auto-voltage for stock frequency testing (all-core Turbo of 4.5GHz with XMP memory) was overly aggressive ranging from anywhere between 1.35 and 1.4 volts. This resulted in higher power consumption when at stock compared to when overclocked.
I think I’m over with all these hardwares. The customer service is rubbish left, right, up and down, vendors and manufacture alike, MSI, Samsung the list goes on… I lost a M.2 screw, and MSI’s support could care less.
Hello Ryan
I’ve just bought this board for my new build. Do you think there’s a way to make the auto voltage function less aggressive?
Thanks 🙂
Hey, you could apply a core voltage offset. I discussed it at the bottom of the UEFI page. I found that -0.1 was enough to keep power down and was still perfectly stable. You may be able to get a lower voltage yourself (-0.1 to -0.2) depending on your CPUs capability. You could also choose a lower LLC setting instead of the Auto LLC setting. The core voltage offset is under MIT-CPU Core Voltage Control, if you leave the core voltage as auto then do the dynamic vcore option (use + and – on the keyboard to get down to -0.1, it’s a bit fiddly). MIT-Advanced Power Options has the LLC setting. Medium or lower should keep the voltage a bit less aggressive but the offset will be the most effective way.
Gigabyte may well alter the voltage behaviour with BIOS updates too so keep an eye out! Also be sure to have the “balanced” windows power profile to get adequate clocking/voltage down for less intensive tasks.
Alright, thanks for the tips!
I’ll make sure to look out for future updates.
The correct screw size is 2.0 x 3mm (CM2x3-3.3)
should be available at hardware / electronics stores.
Thanks for the suggestion, I’ve gone to two electronics stores specialising in screws, nuts and bolts, none of them has anything remotely as small as the M.2 screws. Hope, some manufacturers in computers parts will make them for sale in the future.
Isn’t that audio test pretty seriously flawed? If you do loop back the results are only as good as the line in ADC is and doesn’t really tell anything about the line out DAC quality. Judging by Realtek ALC1220 specs it has much worse line in than line out quality.
Can i run my I7 6700K on this Board?
yes
I see the F4 Bios has ‘V-Core Voltage Adjust’ has anyone used this and did it correct the high auto voltage issue?
Really? This board gets a 8 / 10 when by the picture it looks like it has a craptacular 7 phases? Combine that with the UEFI layout issues, bad auto voltages and thats plenty to bring it down to a 7 / 10.
Stop kissing Gigabytes arse and rate things accordingly.
eu preciso aprender a configurar a memoria g.skil 3200mhz nessa placa. alguem pode me ajudar?
does this motherboard support NVME?
its about what’s said in the reviews, not about the ratings themselves.
the Written Reviews tell you a lot more then just some arbitrary subjective-rating.
an 8/10, 7/10 and even a 6/10 could have a lot different meanings and interpretations base on the person. Some people may not view a 8/10 not that highly while a 6/10 might be seen as a ‘good’ score, to some.
It’s all based on the person perception of the numbers. You can’t objectively score a product like a video-game for example.
That’s why its important to read the ACTUAL review, rather then just look at the Rating/awards given to it. To see what is actually said about the product and make an informed decision based on that, rather then trying to make a decision based off an arbitrary rating.
Fallout New Vegas for example got a 84 on metacritic, though in my opinion its one of best games of that year, even now in my opinion it still holds up quite well as a great game. That said, it got an 84 out of 100 for a score. Does Scoring really matter? It’s meant to give a generic-overall view of the game in simple terms. like “Great Game” or “Great Product”.
7/10, 10/10, 1/10, etc doesn’t matter. What matters is the content of the review, what they say about the product itself, how it runs, it feels, how it looks, features, how it compares to other products in its industry, etc. Don’t take the 8/10 to heart, too much just because you feel the score should be different. Numbers mean different things to different people, so an 8 is not always the “8” the way you may be perceiving it.
Yes, but will depend on how many PCIE lanes you are using and your CPU.
If i enter a value of 1-1.299 it will work and when i put 1.35 for example it switches the mode to AUTO and locks at 1.3
On page 10 of the first guide he specifies how he has a profile with 1.35 voltage and on the second link there are screenshots of him at 1.375
https://view.joomag.com/gigabyte-z270-overclocking-guide-gigabyte-200-series-overclocking-guide/0767815001483933769
http://www.kitguru.net/components/motherboard/ryan-martin/gigabyte-z270x-ultra-gaming-motherboard-review/4/
Is it because I am on version f6 of the BIOS or is my mobo simply locked @ 1.3?
In the first guide he also mentioned how he set his CPU Vcore Loadline Calibration to TURBO and I don’t have this setting available
Z270P-D3 + i7-7700k BIOS version f6