Home / Tech News / Featured Announcement / ASRock Fatal1ty X99 Professional Motherboard Review

ASRock Fatal1ty X99 Professional Motherboard Review

Luke Hill March 16, 2015 Featured Announcement, Motherboard

Cinebench

We used the ‘CPU’ test built into Cinebench R15 .

cinebench

WinRAR

WinRAR’s built in benchmark and hardware test can help us outline the performance differentials between each motherboard. We record the amount of data processed after a 30-second run.

winrar

Handbrake Conversion

We measured the average frame rate achieved for a task of converting a 4.36GB 720P H.264 movie (in the MKV container) to one in the MP4 container.

handbrake

Generally middle-of-the-road performance is shown by the ASRock Fatal1ty X99 Professional in our CPU-heavy tests.

Cinebench puts the part a handful of points off the pace of competing boards with the same clock speed. The WinRAR test is dominated by ASRock motherboards, and the Fatal1ty X99 Professional maintains the trend of strong performance.

Handbrake, however, puts the board a few frames per second behind Asus' leading solution.

Become a Patron!

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

Tags

Check Also

Shadows 1 million

Assassin’s Creed Shadows surpasses 1 million players on day-one

After a ton of waiting and many delays, Assassin’s Creed Shadows is finally here. While Ubisoft’s latest AC title may not be able to singlehandedly dig the publisher out of the hole it’s found itself in, initial response to the game appears solid, with the title having surpassed 1 million players in just a couple hours.

4 comments

  1. JohnnyB
    March 16, 2015 at 9:45 am

    Its quite controversial for a company linked to overworked employees suicides to name their product Fatality…

  2. Guest
    March 16, 2015 at 12:36 pm

    ♪♪get $73 every /hr@ac23:

    Going Here you

    Can Find Out,

    ►►► http://CareerMaxJobs91.biz/live/trades/onlines…

  3. Dave
    May 30, 2015 at 5:19 pm

    You guys make some weird choices. You have trouble using the 2666MMhz g.skill memory and opted to use memory from Corsair, but later in the review you say that the 3000Mhz G.Skill memory was performing fine. So why not do the main tests with the 3000Mhz memory instead of 2666Mhz memory from another manufacturer. It seems to me that the 3000Mhz and 2666Mhz memory modules of G.Skill are closer to each other than 2666Mhz memory from different manufacturers..

  4. Angelo Felan
    September 7, 2015 at 2:45 pm

    so what’s better for gaming the z170 or the x99

© Copyright 2025, Kitguru.net All Rights Reserved Standard Terms

We've noticed that you are using an ad blocker.

Thank you for visiting KitGuru. Our news and reviews teams work hard to bring you the latest stories and finest, in-depth analysis.

We want to be as informative as possible – and to help our readers make the best buying decisions. The mechanism we use to run our business and pay some of the best journalists in the world, is advertising.

If you want to support KitGuru, then please add www.kitguru.net to your ad blocking whitelist or disable your adblocking software. It really makes a difference and allows us to continue creating the kind of content you really want to read.

It is important you know that we don’t run pop ups, pop unders, audio ads, code tracking ads or anything else that would interfere with the KitGuru experience. Adblockers can actually block some of our free content, such as galleries!