Home / Tech News / Highlights-new / Biostar TZ77XE4 Motherboard Review

Biostar TZ77XE4 Motherboard Review

Rating: 9.0.

The Biostar brand doesn't have a massive presence in the UK, at least not in the enthusiast segment of the market.  We consider Asus, ASRock and Gigabyte to be the top three enthusiast brands on the market at the moment but this is something Biostar are looking to change with the release of their new range of motherboards.

Today we are going to look at the top-end motherboard in Biostar's range, the TZ77XE4.  It has been designed with enthusiasts in mind and boasts a feature set to rival some of the best boards currently offered by the market leaders.  We look forward to seeing how well the TZ77XE4 will overclock and perform in our tests.

We will be using both the Intel Core i7-3770K and i7-2700K for testing today.

Features

  • Support the Intel 3rd and 2nd generation Core i7 and Core i5 processors in the 1155 package
  • Intel Z77 single chip architecture
  • Support 4-DIMM DDR3-2600(OC)/2400(OC)/2133(OC)/1866(OC)/1600/1333 up to 32G maximum capacity
  • Support SATA 6Gb/s 2X speed than current SATA 3G
  • Support Intel Smart Response Technology
  • Support USB 3.0
  • 100% X.D.C solid capacitor
  • BIOSTAR G.P.U (Green Power Utility) Technology for Energy Saving
  • BIOSTAR Toverclocker utility

For more detailed information about the TZ77XE4, please visit the Biostar website, here.

Become a Patron!

Check Also

MSI MAG X870 Tomahawk Review

Looking for a good value X870 board that still offers solid features?

7 comments

  1. Nice to see a different company being reviewed on Kitguru. never actually had one of their boards but this one looks quite good to me.

  2. Wow another Z77 board. Id love to know right now, how many Z77 boards are in the channel. must be at least 40.

  3. Good looking board, but not sure I would buy biostar, have they any UK warranty terms etc? I know ASUS have a good return/replace system via their paretners?

  4. MediaExpresso’s chart says higher scores mean better performance.

  5. ?

    I think you might be mistaken. The faster the encoding time, the less time you have to wait.