Home / Tech News / Featured Announcement / ADATA XPG V2 3100MHz 8GB Memory Kit Review

ADATA XPG V2 3100MHz 8GB Memory Kit Review

Due to their out-of-spec base clock configurations, the Avexir Core Extreme Series 3000MHz and ADATA XPG V2 3100MHz memory kits were set to operate at different CPU frequencies, when the default core ratios are used.

For the following tests, we compared both of the ultra-high speed – 3GHz+ – memory kits against each other at almost identical CPU frequencies.

We tweaked the CPU multiplier to get each kit operating with processor speeds as close as possible to each other. This should give an accurate comparison of the performance gains on offer (if any) for higher speed memory.

ADATA XPG V2 3100MHz configuration: 3100MHz 12-14-14-36-2T @ 1.65V (with 4003MHz CPU frequency).

Avexir Core Extreme Series 3000MHz configuration: 3000MHz 12-14-14-35-2T @ 1.65V (with 3988MHz CPU frequency).

sandra mem band  (vs avexir 3000)

sandra cache band  (vs avexir 3000)

Despite operating at a higher DRAM frequency, ADATA's 3100MHz kit still loses out to Avexir's 3000MHz set in Sandra's memory bandwidth test. Given that both kits operate at almost identical primary timings, the performance deficit displayed by the ADATA memory could be related to secondary timings, or even systematic and measurement errors in Sandra's benchmark.

With its slightly-faster CPU frequency and 100MHz DRAM speed increase, the ADATA's kit manages to offer 1.7% more cache bandwidth than Avexir's 3000MHz sticks.

sandra cache & mem lat  (vs avexir 3000)

maxxmem 2 latency (vs avexir 3000)

Latency performance favours the faster kit, given that both set's primary timings are almost identical. ADATA's 3100MHz memory shows a consistent 2.2% performance lead in both latency tests.

maxxmem 2  (vs avexir 3000)

Despite its greater DRAM speed, the Maxxmem2 benchmark does not like the configuration of ADATA's 3100MHz memory. It's hard to think of anything other than secondary timings that could be to blame for Avexir's lower-speed kit with near-identical timings offering greater performance.

cine (vs avexir 3000)

super pi  (vs avexir 3000)

Other than one-hundredth of a point in Cinebench (around 0.1% – well within error margins), there is nothing between the 3000MHz and 3100MHz memory kits when it comes to real-world performance.

Become a Patron!

Check Also

Last day to enter – Win one of THREE Sapphire RX 9070 XT graphics cards!

The KitGuru Reader Survey helps us understand what kind of products you are keen to learn more about in 2025/2026. It takes less than 5 mins to complete and it really helps us to target our editorial efforts. As a thank you to those of you who participate, we are offering the chance for you to win one of THREE brand new Sapphire RX 9070 XT graphic cards! 

4 comments

  1. Great looking kit, but wow at the price, just wow.

  2. These kits are for such a small audiience, but its fascinating to see how much frequency they are getting out of them.

    Shame at these speeds they couldnt tigthen them up a little to 11-12 timings.

  3. how much ADATA XPG V2 3100MHz 8GB Memory Kit Review,,

  4. is there a DDR2 Version for this?

We've noticed that you are using an ad blocker.

Thank you for visiting KitGuru. Our news and reviews teams work hard to bring you the latest stories and finest, in-depth analysis.

We want to be as informative as possible – and to help our readers make the best buying decisions. The mechanism we use to run our business and pay some of the best journalists in the world, is advertising.

If you want to support KitGuru, then please add www.kitguru.net to your ad blocking whitelist or disable your adblocking software. It really makes a difference and allows us to continue creating the kind of content you really want to read.

It is important you know that we don’t run pop ups, pop unders, audio ads, code tracking ads or anything else that would interfere with the KitGuru experience. Adblockers can actually block some of our free content, such as galleries!