Home / Component / AMD Ryzen 9 7900 & Ryzen 7 7700 Review

AMD Ryzen 9 7900 & Ryzen 7 7700 Review

Cinebench Performance Per Watt

Looking at the Cinebench performance efficiency data, the Ryzen 9 7900 non-X is absolutely superb. In fact, the only better option in our chart is a 32-thread Ryzen 9 7950X with a massively constricted power allocation.

The Ryzen 7 7700 does incredibly well, too, and it manages to outperform any of the stock-clocked competitors in our efficiency data.

As is clear, the search for higher frequencies is not good for the Zen 4 power efficiency equation. That’s where one-click PBO can be beneficial though; you can run the chip efficiently for general usage and then crank up the power allocation when certain tasks dictate.

Become a Patron!

Check Also

Senior Intel Engineer Explains the Radical Shift in CPU Design

When Intel launched Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) in 2024 we gave you the technical details and followed up with a review of the Asus Zenbook S 14 which has incredible battery life. In the following month we discussed Intel Arrow Lake (Core Ultra 200S) and how we considered it was unfit for review in a situation that was not resolved until February 2025. On the one hand we have Lunar Lake which we like, while on the other hand we have Arrow Lake which is troubled, yet both families of processors run on Lion Cove P-cores and Skymont E-cores and have a huge amount in common.