We have discussed Fermi's new technology already, including the PolyMorph tessellation engine and improved antialiasing as well as ray tracing with OptiX technology. The Fermi architecture replaces the traditional geometry processing architecture at the front end of the graphics pipeline with an entirely new distributed parallel geometry processing architecture that is implemented using multiple ‘PolyMorph Engines'. Each of these PolyMorph Engines includes a tessellation unit as well as an attribute setup unit and geometry processing units. Each SM has its own dedicated PolyMorph Engine.
In the past, GeForce cards had to rely on a single Raster Engine. Fermi brings more to the table. Much more. The GTX 470/480 have four each, the GTX 465 has three.
Tessellation and all its supporting stages are performed in parallel on GTX 400 series graphics processing units, which helps to create much higher levels of geometry throughput.
There’s something else as well. The GF100 compute architecture, was created with one eye on Ray Tracing. God’s own rendering engine (The Universe) uses an infinite number of photons, bouncing back and forth for billions of years, to create a pretty realistic environment. KitGuru has been looking for years and, without copious amounts of ‘falling down water’, we’ve yet to see a crack in the rendered image.
The GTX480, 470 and 465, support recursion in hardware, enabling efficient ray tracing and many other advanced graphics algorithms. The enhanced L1 and L2 caches improve ray tracing efficiency by accelerating performance of fine grained memory accesses. The L1 cache improves memory locality for adjacent rays and the L2 cache amplified the bandwidth to the framebuffer.
Focusing all this engineering effort on Ray Tracing may or may not be smart. Given that we’re never going to trace every photon in a scene, Ray Tracing is a game of limiting/culling/approximating. On that basis, it may or may not ever overtake other methods for realism. BUT. And it’s a big BUT. Intel has demonstrated a lot of high-powered Ray Tracing intention – which means the next generation of games consoles could have Ray Tracing built in. nVidia is taking no chances, hence the effort.
As we also mentioned before the GF100's GigaThread engine reduces context switch time to approximately 20 microseconds, which makes it possible to execute multiple compute and physics kernels for each frame. Some games, for instance, may use Direct X 11 to render a scene then switch to CUDA for selective ray tracing, make a call to the Direct Compute kernel for post processing and then perform fluid simulations with PhysX. These are executed in parallel, enabling maximum utilization of CUDA cores. We might have to wait a few months for the full force of the Ashu Rege inspired TWIMTBP titles to make full use of these features and workflow, but they will. That, in itself, is very interesting. Remember, the gaming industry would die without TWIMTBP according to Rege, and that sounds serious.
The Zotac GeForce GTX 465 arrives in a typically ‘over-the-top' designed Zotac box – with some mythic monster adorning the front [Norbert Kuperjans taking his morning shower, surely? – Ed].
The bundle includes power converter cables, several adapter cables (mini HDMI to HDMI) as well as a manual, instructions on fitting and a driver CD. Also, it has to be noted, there is a simple cartoon warning not to touch Fermi cards when they have been turned on for a while. You have been warned. By nVidia.
The card ships with a protective clear cover on the the top of the cooler. It is quite unremarkable with only an accented ‘heart beat' graph taking center stage.
The rear of the card follows the PCB design of the GTX 470 series.
As noted earlier, the card requires 2 x 6pin PCI power connectors to function. Nothing out of the ordinary with this configuration and any half decent power supply will supply the necessary wattage with ease.
The back features two very attractive yellow DVI coloured ports. On the left is a mini HDMI connector – there is an adapter supplied to convert this to standard size HDMI for a line out direct to your TV or Monitor.
Thats actually a really good card. thanks for the unbiased and impartial results 🙂
its still quite hot for a mid range card but compared to the higher end models its pretty cool. Nice performance.
5850 is definiately faster overall but it holds onto it pretty well. if you dont like ATI drivers this is a good option.
Interesting results – but the pricing is off. thanks for explaining why though, I will wait for it to drop a little over the next month. my next card!
I was expecting the 465GTX to score a little better, but its clearly outclassed by the 5850. That said, for nvidia fans this is a good option, just seems a little too little , too late.
Funny text in places, gave me a chuckle. 5850 is a better card which this review verifies but the 465 is better than I thought it was going to be.
260 is too much money for this. 200 quid id be tempted. nothing more.
excuse my english – 255 will be how much euros?
bit disappointed, thought it would be the class leader
drop the price nvidia, get into the real world !
good review, informative. it seems to hold its own again the strong AMD competition, noise seems ok, temps a bit hot, but not like 480. all in all a pretty good card, even if its late to the table.
better than I expected, nice card. drop the price.
I am not really that impressed . it should be beating the 5850, its more expensive, later to market and runs hotter while consuming more power. Why is everyone so positive about this?
I agree with long jumper – why is this being received so positively?
because ATI drivers suck, thats why. people are prepared to pay a little extra for forceware, its well known 🙂
Thats actually quite a good card, nice performer. Temps are still a bit worrying for me to be honest, I don’t have a great case at home.
5850 is still better and actually cheaper, dont know what nvidia are thinking
Nice nice nice, I like it. I prefer nvidia cards to ATI and this is next on my list. ill do some shopping around to see if I can get a bit of a deal on one.
I was expecting this to be crap, its not bad. still cant believe how hot they get though, thats really poor design methodology from nv
surprised kitguru got a sample after all the ermm interesting nvidia news reportage lately.
Still have to say, good unbiased review. seems to be a capable board. good job,
Its pretty close to HD5850, which is good enough for me. ill have one 🙂
very nice, thanks
too hot for me, i like my cards cold. will wait on third party cooler to come out. hopefully by then the price has dropped also as they cost a bit much right now. good to see why they cost more though in the conclusion.
not a flop at all. I bet KitGuru are gutted they couldnt slag it off 😉
im impressed with the review, thanks for the coverage so soon.
Overpriced, too hot. no thanks.
This is a total flop. its far too late and offers no performance improvements over 5850, it actually costs more too ! WTF!
wise up NV, almost 90 c under load when overclocked? could double up as a good egg frier. toasty, far too toasty
AMD really have this market still in their pocket. If NV drop the price by £30-50 quid then its a different story, but its still AMDs market.
You AMD fanbois need to shut up. this is a wicked card, the review shows its actually very close in some and WINS IN OTHERS! I wouldnt touch AMD with a 10 foot pole, cause the drivers such azz.
Sam, NVIDIA recently had drivers which bricked cards. I don’t think AMD got to that level.
@Vivian: My guess is that it will be almost the same from $ to £ to €
300 euros I hear.
Good review – I wouldnt touch ATI cards with a bargepole. last card I had the drivers were absolutely shite
The ATI drivers are really good now, I prefer them for watching movies on my tv for instance, the controls work so much better for vibrance, noise reduction and sharpness.
You probably just forgot to test power usage, but this card almost takes as much juice as the 470.
I bet NVIDIA is glad you forgot.
I actually didn’t get time to start running power consumption tests however nvidia have rated the card at 200watts against the 470 at 215watts. 480 is 250 watts. Interestingly they say “TDP is a measure of maximum power draw over time in real world applications. It does not represent the maximum power draw in pathological cases such as Furmark.”
@Zardon: How does one achieve the proper FurMark anyway ?
AMD really have this market still in their pocket. If NV drop the price by £30-50 quid then its a different story, but its still AMDs market.
Thats actually quite a good card, nice performer. Temps are still a bit worrying for me to be honest, I don’t have a great case at home.
http://comprarbaratosmoviles.com/moviles-octa-core
http://movilesbaratoschinos.com/comprar-moviles-chinos