Home / Tech News / Featured Tech Reviews / Zotac GTX 465 Review: Full-on, affordable Fermi?

Zotac GTX 465 Review: Full-on, affordable Fermi?

Crysis Warhead, like the original Crysis, is based in a future where an ancient alien spacecraft has been discovered beneath the Earth on an island east of the Philippines [Brought down by Icelandic ash clouds? – Ed]. The single-player campaign has the player assume the role of (Former SAS) Delta Force operator Sergeant Michael Sykes, referred to in-game by his call sign, Psycho. Psycho’s arsenal of futuristic weapons builds on those showcased in Crysis, with the introduction of Mini-SMGs which can be dual-wielded, a six-shot grenade launcher equipped with EMP grenades, and the destructive, short ranged Plasma Accumulator Cannon (PAX). The highly versatile Nanosuit returns.

In Crysis Warhead, the player fights North Korean and extraterrestrial enemies, in many different locations, such as a tropical island jungle, inside an “Ice Sphere”, an underground mining complex, which is followed by a convoy train transporting an unknown alien object held by the North Koreans, and finally, to an airfield. Like Crysis, Warhead uses Microsoft’s Direct3D 10 (DirectX 10) for graphics rendering.

Testing was taken from a custom run of Cargo Level at 1080p in DX10, gamer settings.

Although the 5850 is leading with both average and maximum frame rates we were interested to see that the minimum frame rates on the GTX 465 were 3fps higher – this actually translates to smoother game play on our test level. The HD5830, once again, trails the pack.

The minimum frame rates graph shows us that only a few times did it drop below 30 fps throughout our testing, which is an excellent result – clearly showing the excellent driver development that has gone hand-in-hand with the hardware improvements.

Become a Patron!

Check Also

First AMD UDNA GPUs expected in 2026

AMD's unreleased UDNA GPU architecture is back in the news, with a fresh leak suggesting …

45 comments

  1. Thats actually a really good card. thanks for the unbiased and impartial results 🙂

  2. its still quite hot for a mid range card but compared to the higher end models its pretty cool. Nice performance.

  3. 5850 is definiately faster overall but it holds onto it pretty well. if you dont like ATI drivers this is a good option.

  4. Interesting results – but the pricing is off. thanks for explaining why though, I will wait for it to drop a little over the next month. my next card!

  5. I was expecting the 465GTX to score a little better, but its clearly outclassed by the 5850. That said, for nvidia fans this is a good option, just seems a little too little , too late.

  6. Funny text in places, gave me a chuckle. 5850 is a better card which this review verifies but the 465 is better than I thought it was going to be.

  7. 260 is too much money for this. 200 quid id be tempted. nothing more.

  8. excuse my english – 255 will be how much euros?

  9. bit disappointed, thought it would be the class leader

  10. drop the price nvidia, get into the real world !

  11. good review, informative. it seems to hold its own again the strong AMD competition, noise seems ok, temps a bit hot, but not like 480. all in all a pretty good card, even if its late to the table.

  12. better than I expected, nice card. drop the price.

  13. I am not really that impressed . it should be beating the 5850, its more expensive, later to market and runs hotter while consuming more power. Why is everyone so positive about this?

  14. I agree with long jumper – why is this being received so positively?

  15. because ATI drivers suck, thats why. people are prepared to pay a little extra for forceware, its well known 🙂

  16. Thats actually quite a good card, nice performer. Temps are still a bit worrying for me to be honest, I don’t have a great case at home.

  17. 5850 is still better and actually cheaper, dont know what nvidia are thinking

  18. Nice nice nice, I like it. I prefer nvidia cards to ATI and this is next on my list. ill do some shopping around to see if I can get a bit of a deal on one.

  19. I was expecting this to be crap, its not bad. still cant believe how hot they get though, thats really poor design methodology from nv

  20. surprised kitguru got a sample after all the ermm interesting nvidia news reportage lately.

    Still have to say, good unbiased review. seems to be a capable board. good job,

  21. Its pretty close to HD5850, which is good enough for me. ill have one 🙂

  22. very nice, thanks

  23. too hot for me, i like my cards cold. will wait on third party cooler to come out. hopefully by then the price has dropped also as they cost a bit much right now. good to see why they cost more though in the conclusion.

  24. not a flop at all. I bet KitGuru are gutted they couldnt slag it off 😉

  25. im impressed with the review, thanks for the coverage so soon.

  26. Overpriced, too hot. no thanks.

  27. This is a total flop. its far too late and offers no performance improvements over 5850, it actually costs more too ! WTF!

  28. wise up NV, almost 90 c under load when overclocked? could double up as a good egg frier. toasty, far too toasty

  29. AMD really have this market still in their pocket. If NV drop the price by £30-50 quid then its a different story, but its still AMDs market.

  30. You AMD fanbois need to shut up. this is a wicked card, the review shows its actually very close in some and WINS IN OTHERS! I wouldnt touch AMD with a 10 foot pole, cause the drivers such azz.

  31. Sam, NVIDIA recently had drivers which bricked cards. I don’t think AMD got to that level.

  32. @Vivian: My guess is that it will be almost the same from $ to £ to €

  33. 300 euros I hear.

  34. Good review – I wouldnt touch ATI cards with a bargepole. last card I had the drivers were absolutely shite

  35. The ATI drivers are really good now, I prefer them for watching movies on my tv for instance, the controls work so much better for vibrance, noise reduction and sharpness.

  36. You probably just forgot to test power usage, but this card almost takes as much juice as the 470.

    I bet NVIDIA is glad you forgot.

  37. I actually didn’t get time to start running power consumption tests however nvidia have rated the card at 200watts against the 470 at 215watts. 480 is 250 watts. Interestingly they say “TDP is a measure of maximum power draw over time in real world applications. It does not represent the maximum power draw in pathological cases such as Furmark.”

  38. @Zardon: How does one achieve the proper FurMark anyway ?

  39. AMD really have this market still in their pocket. If NV drop the price by £30-50 quid then its a different story, but its still AMDs market.

    Thats actually quite a good card, nice performer. Temps are still a bit worrying for me to be honest, I don’t have a great case at home.

    http://comprarbaratosmoviles.com/moviles-octa-core

    http://movilesbaratoschinos.com/comprar-moviles-chinos