Home / Component / CPU / Sapphire Pure Fusion Mini 350 Review (featuring ThermalTake Element Q)

Sapphire Pure Fusion Mini 350 Review (featuring ThermalTake Element Q)

The bios is a fairly basic Americian Megatrends configuration. Below are a variety of screenshots.

System Validation is available over here

CPUz and GPUz are due to get updates shortly to correctly read some of the hardware aspects of this platform (The processor is dual core). We can however see the 40nm Zacate APU has been detected with the correct clock speed highlighted (1.6ghz). This product is Direct X 11 capable.


The newest Catalyst Control Center offers a wide range of settings – especially those for a demanding video enthusiast. We are really looking forward to testing similar Fusion hardware running within the mobile space.

Become a Patron!

Check Also

Leaker claims Nvidia RTX 5070 Ti will pack 8,960 CUDA cores

Leaker Kopite7kimi, known for accurate Nvidia leaks, claims that a GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is in the works and could launch alongside the RTX 5080 at CES.

14 comments

  1. Very nice, I think these will work well in low powered laptops. whenever they make an entrance here in the UK

  2. Well I would say this is a great board, but why on earth are they using SODIMMS? eh? say what?

  3. Quality Sapphire product, but my big question is,. do these systems feel as sluggish as ATOM systems? people who use them will know what I mean. everything you do takes about 2 seconds for the system to take action, even when you are only answering an email.

  4. Good reading, I too am wondering why sapphire opted for SODIMMS on this board. its a bizarre choice.

  5. I think this is $110 bucks, for the board alone. I think it might end up nearer £100 when it hits the rip off UK shores. everything is going up in price with this fucking VAT garbage.

  6. Why are none of the retailers stocking fusion boards in the UK yet? can anyone see them anywhere? OCUK dont even have a category for them at all. I thought the official release was january? anyone?

  7. Ah the mysterious fusion, which is as yet, no where in the UK for sale. AMD really have tried hard to maximise their name and product range while intel was reeling with the sandybridge fiasco. yes, im being sarcastic.

  8. The boards ARE TOO EXPENSIVE. AMD, get your finger out. no one will pay £90 for one of these. they need to drop to £60 inc vat! madness.

  9. Thanks for the review, Zardon. I’m happy to see more Fusion reviews appearing.

    @Brian Crucnsnans, huh? Why wouldn’t people pay £90 for a board that’s better specced than a higher cost Atom/Ion one? Not to mention that it’s a Sapphire product, so why are you pointing the finger at AMD? I’m sure someone will come out with a cheaper board without Bluetooth and other goodies, which might fit better into your price range.

  10. I tend to agree with ET. The board is very well specified. USB 3, SATA 6Gbps, bluetooth, esata. You name it, the sapphire board has it. I am sure cheaper versions of these boards will be released with cut down specifications. Also very interesting to see the ram performance on this product isn’t any less than the higher rated MSI product.

  11. Why wouldnt it be worth £90? seems a really good bit of kit with loads of connectivity. Im waiting on the new sony netbook to hit the UK.

  12. Not sure about that case, but the board seems solid. I have a lot of DDR3 dimms here from older laptops. which would come in handy for a build like this.

  13. One BIOS screen I’d love to see is the GFX configuration.

  14. Stop complaining about cost. The ASRock is on sale on both sides of the Atlantic for $110 here and I’ve seen it for 95P/E here. If want a board that will be dirt cheap and still have HDMI, wait for the Jetway NC85. Still dual core, still HDMI 1.3 and everything else legacy ports, likely to be under $100US, and under 90E.