Home / Tech News / Featured Announcement / Powercolor HD5770 Vortex 1GB Review

Powercolor HD5770 Vortex 1GB Review

When testing the Powercolor HD5770 Vortex we feel it is important to use a system that the buying public would be using in this specific sector. We could easily slot in an Intel 980x, but it’s not a very realistic configuration so we opted for the excellent Core i5 750 which is one of the best value chips on the market right now.

We have tested the HD5850 at 1920×1200 and the HD5670 at 1280×1024 in the past so we will keep testing today at a middle ground of 1680×1050 with AA and high image quality settings when possible. There may be a few of the engines we can easily increase the resolution to 1920×1200, however many people buying one of these cards might not be able to afford a 24 inch screen. Basically, we are aiming to achieve playable framerates with as much eye candy as possible. If I owned a HD5770 I would be looking for this sweet spot.

I also wanted to include results with a Sapphire HD5770 Vapor X card which is clocked slower and will show gains when using this higher overclocked model. The Sapphire card only had a 10mhz increase on the core, so it is very close to reference speeds.

Test System:

PowerColor HD5770 Vortex 1GB

Sapphire HD5770 Vapor X 1GB (860 Core 4.8ghz mem)
Intel Core i5 750 2.66ghz
Corsair 4GB DDR3 @ 1600mhz
MSI P55-GD65
Coolit ECO A.L.C.
Silverstone Raven 2 Chassis

Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit
Catalyst 10.7
Fraps Professional
Corsair TX650W PSU
Dell 2405W Panel
Intel 160GB SSD & 1TB Western Digital Drive

Keithley Integra Model 2700
MultiMeter Thermal Probe
Digital Sound Level Noise Decibel Meter Style 2
Raytek Laser Temp Gun 3i LSRC/MT4 Mini Temp

Colin McRae Dirt 2
Batman: Arkham Asylum
Left 4 Dead 2
Crysis Warhead
Far Cry 2
S.T.A.L.K.E.R. Call Of Pripyat

All the latest bios updates and drivers are used during testing. We perform under real world conditions, meaning KitGuru test all games across five closely matched runs and average out the results to get an accurate median figure.

Our minimum frame rate game graphs have three main zones. These are sampled over a specific 30 interval period of time and then mapped into a chart. These are handy reference guides to detail worst case performance of the product being reviewed. When we test video cards we try to find the best combination of resolution and image quality settings while still maintaining playable frame rates.

Over 30fps is the zone most people want at all times, this means perfectly smooth frame rates with no hitching.

Between 30fps and 25fps is the KitGuru ‘Playable’ zone, although some people might notice occasional stuttering in specific scenes.

Under 25fps is classed as the KitGuru ‘Danger Zone’ which means that the game experience will be less than impressive. Settings and/or resolution would need lowered to help smooth out the frame rate.

Become a Patron!

Check Also

KitGuru Advent Calendar Day 21: Win a Corsair gaming bundle!

For Day 21 of the KitGuru Advent Calendar we have teamed up with Corsair to give one lucky reader a big bundle of gaming gear! One winner today will get a new Corsair gaming chair, a mechanical gaming keyboard and a wireless gaming headset. 

23 comments

  1. Powercolor seem to be a on a roll lately. compared to their cards 2 years ago these are light years ahead. I thought initially the cooler idea on this was a gimmick, but its actually rather practical as you say. First review on the net of this? well done !

  2. Well I am glad someone else commented on the weird car type coolers on these boards, ive no idea why asus and powercolor are keen to promote their cards as vehicles 🙂 Anyway its better than frogs which palit used !

    Good board and as always a fantastic review, love the noise level testing that is one hell of a good performance for an overclocked card.

    I cant see it for sale anywhere? any ETA on sales?

  3. The HD5770 as a series is SO damn good right now, £130!, I will wait to see how powercolor price this, if its £140-145, its a no brainer. I think this might even be better than the vapor X from sapphire. Which I wasnt expected.

  4. I have to comment on the testing. the fact there arent 40 graphs per page with a focus on a real world setting is such a joy for me. I have seen some sites test a HD5770 at 2560×1600 with 8AA and they show results of 2fps. Thats really helpful to everyone. NOT!

    So good job, and as the rest have said already, great performer.

  5. Love these reviews from Zardon on KG, so much detail yet its all relevant. Killer review and what another great product from Powercolor. just hope they make it available where I live as they often dont.

  6. Well this is quiet surprising, but the HD5870 review on kitguru surprised me also. Powercolor are really stepping up to the plate with these card releases. I am so glad they didnt put a whirring fan on this to get lower temperatures at the cost of noise.

  7. Good job from powercolor, but for some reason i cant shake their perspection as a ‘cheaper’ maker, when compared to sapphire, am I wrong?

  8. HD5770 is a solid buy, it always was, but the price drops mean you can get one of these heavily modded boards for the original price of the reference design, cant be bad to that 🙂

  9. @ Frank. You arent the first person to say it, but I think its changed. I know most of these cards are made by the same handful of companies in the first east anyway, so I dont think quality is going to be an issue. The difference between the cards now is really down to the creative minds and R&D teams in each company who come up with the cooler ideas, and the key selling points to differentiate their cards from the other makers. Sapphire have been leading this for years, but with XFX and powercolor stepping up their game lately its not so black and white.

    I wouldnt judge powercolor by a preconceived notion of their name from the past. check out the HD5870 review on Kitguru over here http://www.kitguru.net/components/graphic-cards/zardon/powercolor-hd-5870-pcs-review/. that is a seriously impressive card and I would rather have it than the MSI version which everyone loves 🙂

  10. Great review, solid testing and another winner from PC

  11. Only thing I dislike about powercolor is the naming. this one isnt so bad, but all that PCS+ and PCS++ crap just irritates me.

  12. Like this card a lot, its in the right price range, hopefully its nearer 140 than 150, cause its putting it rather close to the GTX460 if its 150.

  13. HD5000 power consumption always impresses me greately. those fermi cards are just beasts by consideration.

  14. For those handful of people complaining about powercolor name, I had a card fail last year by them and I got it replaced within 2 weeks, and this is in France. I was quite happy with their service. Might not be up to XFX standards but their cards generally are a bit cheaper.

  15. That was great, and I really like the look of this card. I cant see it for sale yet, and its weird they havent released it as the press releases ive found from google said it was out yesterday!?!?!

  16. Brian Dillinger

    140 would be a good price for it. if its 150, i think its a bit close in pricing to the GTX460 which would knock it into a cocked hat.

  17. Nice review, like the noise and temp testing, always better than most sites out there who rate noise on some weird scales no one understands.

  18. Powercolor make some great boards, they all follow a reference design for the components and while they slot on new coolers etc, there is very little they can do to ruin one of these cards anyway. as someone else said I think palit make most of the cards anyway for everyone. believe it or not !

  19. Great review, think ill go order one if I can find it.

  20. Any pricing lists yet? I cant find this bloody card anywhere.

  21. I am sorely tempted to pick one of these up later next month

  22. as much as that card is nice its less powerfull atleast on the benchmarks i use then the GTX 260 which atleast now is being sold for around the same price on newegg and given that the GTX 460 is around 41% more powerfull on the benchmarks i run and only costs like 50 more it seems like it would be a btter idea to just hold on to my money for 1-2 or 3 paychecks and get the GTX 460

  23. I’ve just build new gaming rig & i dont regret buying this card. I play starcraft 2 all max settings with no lag even in most intense battle, fps doesnt go down below 25fps. Im very happy with this card