Futuremark released 3DMark Vantage, on April 28, 2008. It is a benchmark based upon DirectX 10, and therefore will only run under Windows Vista (Service Pack 1 is stated as a requirement) and Windows 7. This is the first edition where the feature-restricted, free of charge version could not be used any number of times. 1280×1024 resolution was used with performance settings.
The Palit GTX760 and GTX770 score very highly, indicating good performance with older Direct X 10 titles. The Palit GTX780 Super Jetstream however is some distance ahead, scoring just under 47,000 points.
Tags GTX 770 and GTX 780 JetStream Review news Palit 760 jetstream Palit 760 jetstream review Palit GTX 760 Palit GTX 760 jetstream Palit GTX 760 jetstream review Palit GTX 770 jetstream Palit GTX 770 jetstream review Palit GTX 780 jetstream Palit GTX 780 jetstream review Palit GTX760 Palit GTX760 jetstream Palit GTX760 jetstream review Palit GTX760 review palit GTX770 palit GTX770 jetstream palit GTX770 review Review
Check Also
Sony reveals Project Amethyst, AMD co-developed next-gen AI-enhanced hardware
In a video presentation featuring Mark Cerny, the lead system architect for the PlayStation 5 …
that 780 looks like gigabyte windforce card you reviewed last week? – looks good mind you. but a rip off?
I have a Palit GTX650Ti, I personally would go with them again.
Great review. And finally, a review that actually turns TressFX on even when using Nvidia GPUs. I wish all reviews did this. Good job Kitguru.
I’ve noticed the 4GB variant of the Palit GTX 770 Jetstream performs worse compared to their GTX 780 and GTX 760 in terms of cooling. I think it’s mainly because of the fins, they’re running the length of the card while using 3 fans. There’s probably some turbulence going on there which lessens the effectiveness of the cooler to expel heat. However, their 2GB GTX 770 Jetstream has the same cooler design of this GTX 780 right here so it’s gonna perform marginally better.