Home / Tech News / Featured Tech Reviews / Nvidia Titan X (Pascal) 12GB Review

Nvidia Titan X (Pascal) 12GB Review

3DMark 11 is designed for testing DirectX 11 hardware running on Windows 7 and Windows Vista. The benchmark includes six all new benchmark tests that make extensive use of all the new features in DirectX 11 including tessellation, compute shaders and multi-threading. After running the tests 3DMark gives your system a score with larger numbers indicating better performance. Trusted by gamers worldwide to give accurate and unbiased results, 3DMark 11 is the best way to test DirectX 11 under game-like loads

3dmark11

3dmark11

3dmark 11 extreme

3dmark11 x

The Nvidia Titan X (Pascal) takes top position in the single GPU chart, around 2,000 points ahead of the Palit GTX 1080 GameRock Premium Edition card.

Become a Patron!

Check Also

AMD Radeon 8060S iGPU matches RTX 4060 Laptop GPU in 3DMark Time Spy

AMD's Strix Halo iGPU performance sure looks impressive. This high-performance APU, featuring up to 16 …

8 comments

  1. WINvidia or AMDream

    I may be inclined to getting two 1080’s before I ever get a Titan. o,O

  2. Clocks on your overclock seem a bit conservative – I’ve managed to hold a stable +235 core / 675 memory on both cards, giving me a base clock of 1655 and boost to 1770, with a memory clock of 1420, giving me 11300 effective.

    Final boost with their boost 3.0 puts me in the 2150-2180 core clock range. Can’t wait to stick waterblocks on them.

  3. and take the wife for supper , damn! 😉

  4. the joys of the silicon lottery I am afraid. I have recently got another Titan X, and it overclocks quite a bit higher.

  5. Yeah it seems I’ve gotten lucky – really lucky in fact, over the last few years. These tx-p’s of mine both top out near 2200 core / 11500 mem, my previous tx-maxwell’s could boost to a shade over 1550 core, and my 5960x can sustain 5.1ghz across all cores @ 1.42v, and I can push a single core to 5.6GHz. Feels like I get danmed lucky, a lot.

    Waterblocks for the tx-p’s have become a more complicated problem though – I was planning on going with EKWB for the setup, but it seems the nvidia HB sli bridge the pascal cards use won’t fit with their pascal blocks, so I’ll need another solution there.

  6. Christopher Lennon

    It’s kind of crazy to think that if you notice, it took in most cases until the Pascal Titan X and in others the 1080 to beat the 295×2 in a lot of benchmarks. Kind of neat that even if you bought the 295×2 at full retail of $1500USD (in the states) in took two years, a node shrink from 28nm to 16nm, and a Video Card costing $1200 to beat it in a lot of cases.

  7. Christopher Lennon

    Are they not benchmarking Doom in Vulkan?

  8. It’s neat that a single card with only around 70% of the shader cores can be equal in performance and consume half the power.

    The 295×2 was fast no doubt about it, but by no means was it particularly impressive. Hot as hell, and needed a beastly power supply to feed it. And thats without overclocking.

We've noticed that you are using an ad blocker.

Thank you for visiting KitGuru. Our news and reviews teams work hard to bring you the latest stories and finest, in-depth analysis.

We want to be as informative as possible – and to help our readers make the best buying decisions. The mechanism we use to run our business and pay some of the best journalists in the world, is advertising.

If you want to support KitGuru, then please add www.kitguru.net to your ad blocking whitelist or disable your adblocking software. It really makes a difference and allows us to continue creating the kind of content you really want to read.

It is important you know that we don’t run pop ups, pop unders, audio ads, code tracking ads or anything else that would interfere with the KitGuru experience. Adblockers can actually block some of our free content, such as galleries!