Home / Tech News / Featured Tech Reviews / HIS HD6970 IceQ Turbo Edition Review

HIS HD6970 IceQ Turbo Edition Review

The tests were performed in a controlled air conditioned room with temperatures maintained at a constant 25c – a comfortable environment for the majority of people reading this.

Idle temperatures were measured after sitting at the desktop for 30 minutes. Load measurements were acquired by playing Crysis Warhead for 30 minutes and measuring the peak temperature. We also have included Furmark results, recording maximum temperatures throughout a 30 minute stress test. All fan settings were left on automatic.

HIS are using a very passive fan profile with this particular solution. With the automatic profile, the fan never spins above 64 percent, which translates to only 2,000 rpm. When gaming, this translates to around 71c under extended load, excellent results.

Return to idle is a feature we have recently added to our reviews … we measure the time it takes for a solution to return to idle temperatures, immediately after full load. The faster the time, the better the cooler – for example a Noctua NH D14 cooler will return an Intel processor to idle temperatures much faster than a reference cooler. This is a good indication of how quickly a heatsink can dissipate heat.

The fan starts to spin down rapidly after the card drops to 60c. It takes around 26 seconds for the board to return to idle. Very good results.

Become a Patron!

Check Also

Corsair Xeneon 34WQHD240-C Review (Ultrawide 240Hz QD-OLED)

This is a 240Hz QD-OLED ultrawide from Corsair - we find out what it's all about

17 comments

  1. I really would love to know what they are thinking with these coolers’ they are so mad looking id love to see the development team behind them 🙂

    Great cards though, as has been proven over the last year.

  2. I like the appearance ! its very different. the price seems to be good. most of them are 280?

  3. This is a far east design, they don’t get enough feedback from westerners with their card design. look at the difference between sapphire and HIS for designs.

    I am not saying its a problem for HIS, but the differences are in the cultural designs between the companies.

  4. They aren’t a make I normally look at. this is one ugly card. Not sure I could get past that.

  5. The only problem for me is that the GTX570 is a better card and faster. I doubt many people use more than one monitor. its pointless saying its any different.

    24 inch screen 1920×1080 is the average ‘enthusiast’ panel size and res

  6. What a bonkers design, someone has been on the jack daniels during the design phase

  7. Sapphire for me im afraid,. I dont think HIS have a reptuation yet for these kind of cards.

    Temps are high IMO too.

  8. How far is that over the edge of the PCB? that might prove a fitting issue in some cases I would think

  9. People always bitch about HIS, ive owned three of their cards and I think they aer very good. warranty is always strong with retailers too. no problems buying one.

    great product, id buy this, but its a little much for me im happy with my 5 series card. waiting for 7 series !

  10. Is it just me or are there just too many cards out on the market to keep track of? I keep forgetting who has what out. The MSI card is the best imo, but its over 300 still I think

  11. Tres Spunkilisiou

    Two of these in CFx would be great. 6 screen gaming possible? 3×3 side by side and vertically mounted? might need three of them? anyone know?

  12. Someone in that company has been on the tequila during a design phase of this card!

    It works well, thats the funny thing…

  13. Looks like we are back at 2000.

  14. How come another site got theres upto 1050mhz core clock at 70 degrease none the less?

  15. Every card is different, they don’t all overclock the same. Some publications use different methods to test temperatures.

  16. Thanks for the quick reply 🙂

  1. Pingback: Wednesday News, May 25th 2011