Home / Component / APU / Gigabyte F2A85X-UP4 & AMD A10 5800K Review (w/ discrete)

Gigabyte F2A85X-UP4 & AMD A10 5800K Review (w/ discrete)

Futuremark released 3DMark Vantage, on April 28, 2008. It is a benchmark based upon DirectX 10, and therefore will only run under Windows Vista (Service Pack 1 is stated as a requirement) and Windows 7. This is the first edition where the feature-restricted, free of charge version could not be used any number of times. 1280×1024 resolution was used with performance settings.

The system scores 18,774 points. the A10 5800K processor holds back the overall performance somewhat, scoring 10,610 points. The HD7970 GHZ scores 25,251 points which is around 9,000 points less than in our long term Core i7 970 system (34,210 points).

The overall scores from the AMD A10 5800k system are comparable against a similarly priced system using a Core i3 2105 processor.

Become a Patron!

Check Also

First AMD UDNA GPUs expected in 2026

AMD's unreleased UDNA GPU architecture is back in the news, with a fresh leak suggesting …

4 comments

  1. The prices of these A85X motherboards are stupid. I wouldnt pay this for a board for a £95 chip

  2. Nice one AMD, im impressed with this chip. might think about getting one later this year, but I agree on motherboard price. it makes the whole deal seem less palatable.

  3. Awesome stuff, love it.

  4. Does kind of make me wonder when using a discrete graphics, that unless the on-board graphics hybrid crossfires with it, what’s the point of having have half the die of the chip made up of graphics. Being a gamer i wouldn’t be using the on-board, I know that it is a nice balance, but id love to see an AMD Piledriver sans graphics (Binary ?) with the full die for the CPU. Selfish maybe… 😉