Home / Tech News / Featured Tech News / Asus R9 285 STRIX Review

Asus R9 285 STRIX Review

Today we test with the latest Catalyst 14.7 beta driver and Forceware 340.52 driver. We didn't receive a reference clocked AMD R9 285 to review, so to be even handed we tested against other overclocked solutions widely available today from both Nvidia and AMD partners.
system

We are using one of our brand new test rigs supplied by DINOPC and built to our specifications. If you want to read more about this, or are interested in buying the same Kitguru Test Rig, check out our article with links on this page. We are using an Apple 30 inch Cinema HD monitor for this review today.

We include the GTX750Ti today as a comparison to show you what you can get if you move up from the £100-£120 market.

We tried to downclock the XFX R9 280 Black OC Edition to the same 954mhz speed as the Asus R9 285 Strix, but we couldn't get the clock speed to hold at these speeds without variances. We therefore tested all cards at their ‘out of the box' speeds in this review today.

Comparison cards:
DSCF2571
XFX R9 280X (1000 mhz more / 1500 mhz memory)
XFX R9 280 Black OC Edition (1000 mhz core / 1300 mhz memory)
Asus GTX760 Direct CU II OC (1006 mhz core / 1502 mhz memory)
Asus GTX750 Ti (1072 mhz / 1350 mhz memory)

Software:
Windows 7 Enterprise 64 bit
Unigine Heaven Benchmark
Unigine Valley Benchmark
3DMark Vantage
3DMark 11
3DMark
Fraps Professional
Steam Client
FurMark

Software and Games:

3DMark Vantage
3DMark 11
3DMark
Unigine Heaven
Unigine Valley
Tomb Raider
Grid Autosport
Wolfenstein: The New Order
Battlefield 4
Thief
Total War: Rome 2

All the latest BIOS updates and drivers are used during testing. We perform generally under real world conditions, meaning KitGuru tests games across five closely matched runs and then average out the results to get an accurate median figure. If we use scripted benchmarks, they are mentioned on the relevant page.

Become a Patron!

Check Also

ASUS ProArt PA27JCV Review (5K/60Hz Professional Monitor)

We check out a gorgeous 5K professional screen from the ASUS ProArt range

8 comments

  1. I just dont understand the purpose of this card.
    Its no more efficient than previous GCN cards.

    Atleast Nvidia is releasing a much better architecture with 750 Ti and 960/970/980.

  2. I was expecting a bit better from AMD,i thought the 285 wil be faster than the 280x. Guess i’ll wait a bit and see Nvidia’s offering to replace my 7850.

  3. To use up the chips which weren’t good enough to be sold as 290s and push TrueAudio support.

  4. Where’s the power consumption test? It should, in theory, be less power hungry.

  5. Cons:

    R9 285 pricing needs adjusted if AMD want to be competitive against their own products.

    I don’t expect them to do it. Nvidia’s CEO speaks about higher prices in the future and articles about AMD not considering changing their GPU prices where posted a few days ago. Also AMD has done this before. They replaced better performing cards – 7730, 7750 and 7770 – with slower cards – 240, 250 – at the same price points. They are doing it now again. Lower specs, higher price.

  6. Go ahead and replace your 7850 I had two in CFX and replaced it with this card and you know what I don’t regret it one bit

  7. This card even though very very good on 1080p gaming just can’t cut the mustard with 4K gaming which is where AMD pitched this card maybe if it had 4GB of Vram then it would be a much better contender

  8. damn you Nvidia fans boys come out in droves…. It isnt meant for 4k gaming … And if you want big green go with big green… damn…