Home / Component / CPU / ASRock E350M1 Fusion Review

ASRock E350M1 Fusion Review

To test the Fusion platform today, we are using a wide selection of real world and synthetic tests, clearly labeled. If you are only interested in video quality and hardware performance we advise you to shift forward in the review to the real world and image quality sections.

We also felt it would be interesting to compare some of our findings against the Intel Atom platform, in the shape of the 1.8GHz D525 processor. We have also included results from a previous generation AMD Turion 64 X2 L510 clocked at 1.6ghz.

ASrock E350M1 system build:
CPU/GPU: AMD Zacate APU – E350 (HD6310 graphics)
Motherboard: ASRock E350M1
Chassis: Thermaltake Element Q
Memory: Kingston 4GB DDR3
Hard Drive: Samsung 2.5 inch 250GB

Supplemental Hardware:
Solid State: Kingston Hyper Max 3.0 x 2
Optical: Asus USB 2.0 BluRay Drive
Graphics Card: Sapphire HD6850 (via the 4x PCIe Slot)
Monitors: Sharp 50 inch 1080p Aquos LCD TV, LaCie 730 (IQ testing) and Dell U2410

Comparison processors:
Atom D525 @ 1.8ghz
Turion X64 X2 L510 @ 1.6ghz

Software:
Windows 7 64 Bit
Aida 64
SiSoft Sandra
Cinebench R11.5 64 bit
Cyberlink Media Espresso
Cyberlink PowerDVD Ultra V10
3Dmark Vantage
HQV Benchmark V 2.0
Left4Dead
Resident Evil 5

Technical Monitoring and Test Equipment:
Keithley Integra unit
Thermal Diodes
Raytek Laser Temp Gun 3i LSRC/MT4 Mini Temp
Extech digital sound level meter & SkyTronic DSL 2 Digital Sound Level Meter
Kill A Watt Meter

All results are gained from multiple test runs to ensure any abnormalities are removed before publication.

Become a Patron!

Check Also

AMD Krackan Point APU appears in the Geekbench database

AMD's next-gen Ryzen AI 300 series APUs are on the horizon, and a fresh Geekbench …

8 comments

  1. I honestly feel this is the best of them all, because of the price. I also dont think many media users will care about USB 3, so I always thought it was a weird inclusion in the first place.

  2. No frills, but the price is great. ive found it for £70 in the UK, which is half the price of the asus board. Quite a saving, even if it isnt as nice.

  3. Where did you find it for that price? I cant even find Uk stock at all.

  4. Impossible to get fusion products over here. sucks.

  5. hits a good price point, but the asus board has me spoilt for choice, looks so much better with a lot more options.

  6. the passively cooled boards appeal to me more than these ones. those little fans are a failure waiting to happen

  7. The system configuration mentioned at the end uses SO-DIMM memory, even though the review says the Asrock uses normal DIMMs. And why use a 2.5″ disk when the case supports 3.5″?

  8. The SO-Dimm listed once was a typo. its regular memory used. fixed that.

    The 2.5 inch drive was used because it was handy at the time, the case certainly supports both yes, so either could be used. Some people building this system might be using a smaller chassis and a 2.5 inch drive would be viable, perhaps even an SSD for quicker boot times. I think a lot of people might have spare 2.5 inch laying around. or perhaps its just me !