Home / Component / CPU / ASRock E350M1 Fusion Review

ASRock E350M1 Fusion Review

The tests were performed in a controlled air conditioned room with temperatures maintained at a constant 24c – a comfortable environment for the majority of people reading this.

Idle temperatures were measured after sitting at the desktop for 30 minutes. Load measurements were acquired by running Furmark and Cinebench together. We included results from a diode which we placed beside the motherboard and the exhaust fan.

One thing we like about the Fusion products we have tested is that even without chassis fans, the components are cool running. The processor peaks at 61c when fully loaded for instance, well within parameters.

Become a Patron!

Check Also

Nvidia RTX 50 laptop GPU specs claimed to include 16GB VRAM and up to 175W TDP

Although the launch of Nvidia's RTX 50 series might still be a few weeks away, …

8 comments

  1. I honestly feel this is the best of them all, because of the price. I also dont think many media users will care about USB 3, so I always thought it was a weird inclusion in the first place.

  2. No frills, but the price is great. ive found it for £70 in the UK, which is half the price of the asus board. Quite a saving, even if it isnt as nice.

  3. Where did you find it for that price? I cant even find Uk stock at all.

  4. Impossible to get fusion products over here. sucks.

  5. hits a good price point, but the asus board has me spoilt for choice, looks so much better with a lot more options.

  6. the passively cooled boards appeal to me more than these ones. those little fans are a failure waiting to happen

  7. The system configuration mentioned at the end uses SO-DIMM memory, even though the review says the Asrock uses normal DIMMs. And why use a 2.5″ disk when the case supports 3.5″?

  8. The SO-Dimm listed once was a typo. its regular memory used. fixed that.

    The 2.5 inch drive was used because it was handy at the time, the case certainly supports both yes, so either could be used. Some people building this system might be using a smaller chassis and a 2.5 inch drive would be viable, perhaps even an SSD for quicker boot times. I think a lot of people might have spare 2.5 inch laying around. or perhaps its just me !