Home / Tech News / Featured Tech Reviews / AMD R9 290X Review (Ultra HD 4K testing – Part 2)

AMD R9 290X Review (Ultra HD 4K testing – Part 2)

We have built a system inside a Lian Li chassis with no case fans and have used a fanless cooler on our CPU. The motherboard is also passively cooled. This gives us a build with almost completely passive cooling and it means we can measure noise of just the graphics card inside the system when we run looped 3dMark tests.

We measure from a distance of around 1 meter from the closed chassis and 4 foot from the ground to mirror a real world situation. Ambient noise in the room measures close to the limits of our sound meter at 28dBa.

Why do this? Well this means we can eliminate secondary noise pollution in the test room and concentrate on only the video card. It also brings us slightly closer to industry standards, such as DIN 45635.

KitGuru noise guide

10dBA – Normal Breathing/Rustling Leaves
20-25dBA – Whisper
30dBA – High Quality Computer fan
40dBA – A Bubbling Brook, or a Refridgerator
50dBA – Normal Conversation
60dBA – Laughter
70dBA – Vacuum Cleaner or Hairdryer
80dBA – City Traffic or a Garbage Disposal
90dBA – Motorcycle or Lawnmower
100dBA – MP3 player at maximum output
110dBA – Orchestra
120dBA – Front row rock concert/Jet Engine
130dBA – Threshold of Pain
140dBA – Military Jet takeoff/Gunshot (close range)
160dBA – Instant Perforation of eardrum
acoustics performance
I have been quite vocal in the past regarding my feelings about reference AMD coolers. Nvidia can build them well (the GTX Titan is proof of this), but AMD have always struggled.

The cooler on the AMD R9 290X is not too bad, but it really should have been better.

When Quiet mode is enabled, the card is audible under load, but it rates very closely against the GTX Titan cooler – which is commendable. The only problem is our testing has shown today that at this setting, the core clock speed downclocks when the cooler can't cope with the 95c default temperature settings.

We therefore have to advise our readers to use the UBER setting with the fan speed increased from a maximum of 40% to 55%. When the single fan is spinning at 55% it emits almost 36 dBa of noise, which is perfectly audible. The pitching of the small AMD fan isn't pleasant either. When tasked with Furmark the fan spins up from 2,300 rpm to around 3,000 rpm.

I have to admit that AMD's strategy sometimes seems puzzling to me. They know that partners such as Sapphire can product fantastic heatpipe style coolers, but they force a reference launch featuring their own reference cooler. We really should be focusing on the incredible performance of the hardware today, not the cooler.

Become a Patron!

Check Also

First AMD UDNA GPUs expected in 2026

AMD's unreleased UDNA GPU architecture is back in the news, with a fresh leak suggesting …

18 comments

  1. You seem to have put dBa rating on power consumption by mistake 😛

  2. Awesome, thanks – very very interesting!

  3. Just an amazing card, can’t wait for the custom coolers + OC editions

  4. Impressive performance, I can’t even get that at 1080p with my system :p

  5. Terrible Terrance

    I want a 4K monitor badly, but I can only stretch to £2,000 savings. waiting patiently for this one to drop next year. fingers crossed!

  6. Nice review, very interesting to see how things go in the future. I prefer gaming on consoles recently, but PC’s are miles ahead, lets be honest about it.

  7. £3k for a monitor? holy crap on a stick. awesome though to drool over. I think this makes more sense long term for people as using three monitors needs such a massive desk it isn’t practical. a single monitor with super high resolution is the way forward.

    Do you find some of the textures on older games look really nasty though? I bet only the latest games with tight afflliation with AMD or NVIDIA look great. Which reminds me, I need to get that batman game soon!

  8. Did you really put 6 expensive pieces of hardware on your carpet? ..for photo purposes?
    That’s fairly outrageous. Your negligence puts me at a loss for words.

  9. @ jjj – the cards with the slot directly on the ground are actually resting on a small clear plastic sheet. The other cards are side ways on the floor, and as you might imagine the plastic coolers won’t self destruct if they touch a carpet. We appreciate your concern, but we weren’t going to bill you, don’t panic.

  10. I was actually looking for a review on this and its just what Ineed

  11. Amazing to see such a useful article and some idiot complaining about negligence (probably owns a HD7770 and has some serious jealousy issues!), Shame his loss for words didnt translate into his hands moving away from the keyboard.

    Good review, got a lot of useful info from the results. GTX Titan is very good at this res, im sure the 6GB of memory helps in some games too.

  12. Lovely indeed, want that monitor for sure!

  13. well that was a great read, thanks. Wish I could afford the 290X, any news on the 290 pricing or release date yet? please?

  14. Wow, even the 280x outperforms the GTX780 in many of the tests. It’s still early days for 4K gaming though, but definitely something I look forward to.

  15. all the benchmarks i’ve seen so far Nvidia outperform Amd in low resolution, but as resolution increases beyond 1920×1080 ,AMD GCN outperforms Nvidia , even R7-280x pulls close to gtx 780 ,so $300 amd card matching $650 Nvidia card, wow.seems like AMD GCN is why superior to NVIDIA kepler.

  16. just a 7970 GHz edition card notting more!

  17. I did not take jjj comment too seriously. Provided me with a nice dose of laughter.

  18. I’m not 100% on this but I’m pretty sure these aren’t the first AMD cards to offer crossfire without bridges… The bridges are almost an achilles’ heel anyways.