Home / Tech News / Announcements / AMD HD6450 Review

AMD HD6450 Review

The tests were performed in a controlled air conditioned room with temperatures maintained at a constant 25c – a comfortable environment for the majority of people reading this.

Idle temperatures were measured after sitting at the desktop for 30 minutes. Load measurements were acquired by playing Crysis Warhead for 30 minutes and measuring the peak temperature. We also have included Furmark results, recording maximum temperatures throughout a 30 minute stress test. All fan settings were left on automatic.

The fan peaks at 50%, which is reasonably quiet, even when loaded with the Furmark stress test. When gaming, the temperatures generally peak around 57c rising to 62c under synthetic load. This is a cool running card, as we would expect.

Become a Patron!

Check Also

First AMD UDNA GPUs expected in 2026

AMD's unreleased UDNA GPU architecture is back in the news, with a fresh leak suggesting …

6 comments

  1. Seems like a very decent card for the money. Not my cup of tea, but for media duties, very nice indeed.

  2. If they clock this to 625mhz it will not relate to these scores unfortunateyl, thats a significant core clock drop.

  3. Not a very exciting product, but the fact you can game on more than one screen, even if the IQ would be rubbish is a very cool idea. Great idea for a second system but I cant see this being used as a gaming card, more for media.

    In that area it does very well indeed.

  4. Sales in this market are much larger than the high end but there is very little money to be made here by AMD or their partners, maybe $10 a card profit.

    This is a nice update, but passive would be more appealing to me than a fan.

  5. The HD6450 seems like a nice HTPC card, if not a tad expensive.

    Also, it’s nice to see a tech review site that actually makes an effort to make sure that their graphs are clear to read, so people can actually quickly make sense of the data (the whole point in a graph). Keep up the good work.

  6. Not a very exciting product, but the fact you can game on more than one screen, even if the IQ would be rubbish is a very cool idea. Great idea for a second system but I cant see this being used as a gaming card, more for media.But the diappionting aspect is it does not have pixel shader version of 5