Home / Tech News / Featured Tech Reviews / AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB Review

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB Review

Tomb Raider received much acclaim from critics, who praised the graphics, the gameplay and Camilla Luddington’s performance as Lara with many critics agreeing that the game is a solid and much needed reboot of the franchise. Much criticism went to the addition of the multiplayer which many felt was unnecessary. Tomb Raider went on to sell one million copies in forty-eight hours of its release, and has sold 3.4 million copies worldwide so far. (Wikipedia).

Tomb-Raider-1440-1 Tomb-Raider-Ultimate-4K-1 Tomb-Raider-1440-2

We test using the Ultimate quality profile for both resolutions. The in-game benchmark is used.

tomb raider 1440

TR 4k

Tomb Raider has the R9 Nano slightly ahead of Asus' GTX 980 STRIX, although this result is close enough to be considered a draw. The R9 Fury X and GTX 980 Ti shows healthy performance leads over the similarly-priced R9 Nano.

4K testing opens a slight gap for the R9 Nano over its R9 390X and GTX 980 competition. As with 1440P though, the similarly-priced GTX 980 Ti and R9 Fury X are noticeably faster than the R9 Nano.

Become a Patron!

Check Also

Leaker claims RTX 50 GPUs to launch in Q1 2025

The GeForce RTX 50 series launch is rapidly approaching, and thanks to the latest reports, …

12 comments

  1. Price!! AMD… I know it’s unique but you had a good opportunity to fight NVIDIA but you priced yourself too high (again).

  2. And with their yield issues it will be priced even higher at retailers lol.

  3. Who are you kidding?

  4. I can’t see how they can charge the same as a Fury X and the Fury X has the added cost of watercooling.

  5. Don’t matter on price, Gaming enthusiast’s will buy it just because of the size and performance it give’s, If people are willing to spend like 1500 for a titan X, I’m sure people will pay 1/3 of the price for the nano.

  6. Can you cram Fury x into SFF case?

  7. ^ This, it delivers very well for the size/form factor in spades. But if anyone has the space/non ITX case to house longer cards the Nano isn’t for them, people just need to realize this and move on.

  8. yes. Read a review somewhere (Hexus?) where they mentioned you could cram a Fury X into some mITX cases 🙂

    Most mITX cases are long, to incorporate a full sized GFX card, you can for example get a Strix 980 into a Fractal Node 304. It’s only when you get down to stuff like the Coolermaster Elite 110 that an mITX card becomes necessary.

  9. For £515 you can buy a 980Ti, unless you really needed a smaller card why would you purchase this ?

  10. Indeed. Most of the people complaining about the niche this card lives in wouldn’t be buying one anyway, they’re just more interested in complaining about it.

  11. Most of the complaining is from nvidia fanboys, trolls or paid shills. There is no way a sane consumer can be totally blind to the value proposition this card gives in ultra SFF compared to useless value the titan X gives when it is so overpriced for any form factor.

    Of course there are some legitimate voices of dissatisfaction among those who really wanted to buy this card thinking it will be a more cut down version of Fiji chip and could be had for like 400-450 USD, those people have legit reasons to be slightly miffed but given the performance this thing shows they will quickly realize this card isn’t for them, the $549 R9 Fury is.

  12. I would buy it with no hessitation, and I’m a full tower user.