We put the Workstation Specialists System through a suite of workstation benchmarks. For comparison, we pitted it against the Overclockers RENDA PW-E7F, Scan 3XS GW-HTX35 and Armari Magnetar V25R-RA750G2.
Software:
Cinebench R15
SPECviewperf 12.1
LuxMark 3.1
CrystalDiskMark
RENDA PW-E7F Specifications:
- Intel Core i7-5960X @ 4.2GHz
- 32GB DDR4 SDRAM @ 2667MHz
- ASUS X99-E WS Motherboard
- 256GB Samsung 850 Pro SATA III 6Gb/s SSD
- 2TB Seagate Barracuda SATA III 6Gb/s 7,200rpm HDD
- 8GB GDDR5 AMD FirePro W8100 Graphics
- EK-WB water cooling
- SuperFlower PSU
- Phanteks chassis
- Windows 8.1 Pro 64bit
- 5 Years, 3 Years Collect and Return, 2 Years Labour
Scan 3XS GW-HTX35 Specifications:
- 2x Intel Xeon E5-2687W V3 @ 3.1GHz
- 64GB Crucial ECC Registered DDR4 SDRAM @ 2,133MHz
- ASUS Z10PE-D8 WS Motherboard
- 512GB Samsung 850 Pro SATA III 6Gb/s SSD
- 2TB Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 SATA III 6Gb/s 7,200rpm HDD
- 12GB GDDR5 NVIDIA Quadro M6000 Graphics
- 2x 3XS customised Corsair H80 water cooling
- 1,000W Corsair RM PSU
- Fractal Design Define XL Titanium Grey chassis
- Windows 7 Professional 64bit
- 3 Years warranty, 1 Year Onsite, 2 Years RTB
Armari Magnetar V25R-RA750G2 Specifications:
- AMD Ryzen 7 1800X @3.6GHz
- 32GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 SDRAM @ 2,400MHz
- Biostar X370GTN Motherboard
- 512GB Samsung PM961 M.2 NVMe PCI Express SSD
- 32GB GDDR5 AMD Radeon Pro Duo Graphics
- Sealed AIO water cooling
- 750W Platinum Efficiency PSU
- Custom V25 Pristine White chassis
- Windows 10 Professional 64-bit
- 3 Years Warranty Parts and Labour, 1 Year Onsite, 2 Years RTB
But can it run minecraft
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/d35af349501f359d6bd115b13674892c3cee26f1099902e01a6ea61eea2b39de.jpg
This is such a stupid choice of parts. #1 The X99 platform, there is both the x299, and the Xeon platform which would be more suitable. #2 The Corsair H100i, which should be at least the H115i or preferably an NZXT or EVGA CLC 280 cooler, both of which are significantly better and quieter. #3 the RAM should be ECC in a workstation build, further pointing towards Xeon/Epyc as a platform base rather than x99. #4 The PSU in a £17k build should be as good as possible, ie a titanium rated one such as the Corsair AXi 1500 or Silverstone Prime Titanium 1000, as saving £50 on installing a platinum PSU doesn’t make sense at this budget. #5 I really think that while the 960 evo is great, in a *17k* build, the pro is a much more sensible option, also 250gb is pathetic.
I see so much of these high end builds, which aren’t really thought through, when they really should be, if made by a professional company. Of course this PC is still *good*, as the components are excellent, but it is not *great* because the components are not appropriate for the budget and use scenario.
Edit, it’s a flipping 18k build and they’re using an out of date platform as a base and sub ideal components… wow.
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
Check these systems out instead: https://www.kitguru.net/desktop-pc/james-morris/armari-amd-ryzen-threadripper-1950x-versus-intel-core-i9-7980xe-shootout/
https://uk.pcpartpicker.com/user/davengerdann/saved/ I know how to build systems, thanks anyway.
Never said you didn’t… I was merely (and brazenly) directing you towards another article I wrote! ?
Dainel. Fuck if ever there was an elitist you made the dictionary definition. Kick the hell back dude. You’re in the Metaverse.