To illustrate a wide range of possible workstation specifications, we used four cards from NVIDIA's current Quadro range. These were the K620, K2200, K4200, and K5200. This wasn't the entire range – we didn't include the super-low-end K420, the mid-range K1200 or the ultra-high-end K6000 or M6000. The cards we chose represent the most frequently supplied graphics in workstations aimed at mainstream applications.
The K620 is a basic professional 3D accelerator. It still sports 384 CUDA cores, which is a decent quantity, and offers 2GB of frame buffer, but the latter is just DDR3 and the memory interface 128-bit, so only 29GB/sec bandwidth is available. The K2200 is much more potent as a 3D accelerator, with 640 CUDA cores and 4GB of GDDR5 memory, offering 80GB/sec bandwidth. With the K4200 we enter the high end. This card provides 1,344 CUDA cores, and although it has the same 4GB of GDDR5 memory, the 256-bit bus means the bandwidth is more than doubled compared to the K2200, to 173GB/sec. Finally, the K5200 is an ultra-high-end card with 2,304 CUDA cores and a whopping 8GB of GDDR5 memory. Like the K4200, it has a 256-bit memory bus, but faster memory ensures 192GB/sec of bandwidth.
This reminds me of this : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U5Npt1BSF04
►►► $73.. per-hr @mi9//
,,
➨➨➨https://WorldStarHipHopHosts.com/skills/help…
☠☠☠☠—-.✉✉✉✉☠i like kitguru -in-law makes $86 /hr on the laptop . She has been out of work for 6 months but last month her paycheck was $14455 just working on the laptop for a few hours. check out the post right here > Find More
Good video!
So you havent done a single test in any of demanding programs like premiere, vegas, ae, maya, 3dmax or even blender? Why would I buy an quadro above gtx 780 (for example) the second one is cheaper and has more cores, Id love to see some actual benchmarks proving quadro is or is not actually better in such usage.