Home / Component / Cooling / Raijintek Morpheus GPU Cooler Review

Raijintek Morpheus GPU Cooler Review

To test the performance of the Raijintek Morpheus with two Noctua 120mm fans (1x NF-P12 and 1x NF-F12) we built a powerful X79 based system in a Corsair Obsidian 780T case, featuring a reference AMD Radeon R9 290X graphics card.  We will also compared the thermal results with a NZXT Kraken G10 (with Kraken X40) graphics card cooler, an Arctic Accelero Xtreme IV and Arctic Accelero Hybrid II graphics card cooler on the same GPU.

Test System
  • Processor: Intel Core i7-3930K
  • Motherboard: Asus P9X79
  • Memory: 16 GB (4 x 4 GB) Mushkin Blackline 1600 MHz
  • Thermal Paste: Noctua NT-H1
  • Graphics Card: AMD Radeon R9 290X
  • Power Supply: Seasonic Platinum P1000W
Software
  • FurMark 1.14.1
  • CPUID Hardware Monitor

Become a Patron!

Check Also

Ducky One 3 Pro Nazca Line Keyboard Review

The One 3 Pro Nazca Line keyboard from Ducky feature the revamped Cherry MX2A switches

4 comments

  1. Why not put the 7V results for the Arctic in the noise chart? As for not commenting on the noise… don’t you mean to say that noise is actually better with this one precisely because you can use more efficient fans? Of course, then there is a cost-performance ratio. You really should have tested this with a pair of budget sleeve fans also, not just expensive Noctuas. The $4 Thermaltake fans from Micro Center would be a good choice.

  2. Where can I buy this? Thank you.

  3. i use i for almost a year on a Direct CU 280X nad 2x phantakes fans for 9 EUr each they are not hear able not even on 100%speed and really happy with it the heat dont go over 60 deg not even in hot summer days now looking to purchase another one since i going to upgrade my system for another GPU . can only recommend it since it is better than arctic accelero since when the fans will be broken yo ucan easly replace them of any other and dont need to purchase expansive replacement part

  4. The cooler is posiblly more efficent than arctic ones but only if u have case fans set at a minimum speed. I know this because i mode my gtx 1070 with 2×120 fans and the gpu temp gets very fast to 65°C and then the case fan kick and go from 300 rpm to 600 rpm and the temperature drops fast to 50°C. This cooler is very dependant on case air flow so because test methodology implied that case fans should not run this cooler was penalized more. That is why Ive seen this cooler beating arctic coolers in another review