Today we are looking at no less than three RTX 5080 partner cards. We have the Gigabyte Gaming OC, MSI Suprim SOC, and the Palit GamingPro OC. With prices ranging from £1115 up to an eye-watering £1380, we put these three cards through their paces, looking at gaming performance, thermals, noise levels, power draw and more to see how they compare…
Timestamps
00:00 Intro
01:18 Gigabyte Gaming OC design
02:53 Gaming OC PCB + heatsink
03:46 MSI Suprim SOC design
05:15 Suprim SOC PCB + heatsink
06:05 Palit GamingPro OC design
07:27 GamingPro OC PCB + heatsink
07:44 Test setup
08:12 Thermals
08:46 Gigabyte thermal putty re-assembly testing
09:45 Noise and noise-normalised thermals
10:58 Gaming benchmarks, clock speed
12:17 Overclocking
13:38 Closing thoughts and pricing discussion
Following on from our launch day RTX 5080 review, today we are assessing the three partner cards we were sent for review. The MSI RTX 5080 Suprim SOC is undoubtedly the most premium of the bunch, priced at nearly £1400, while it uses the same cooler and heatsink design as we found on the RTX 5090 model, so we're expecting good things when it comes to thermal performance.
The Gigabyte RTX 5080 Gaming OC isn't quite so expensive at £1250, but is still designed to offer a suitably high-end experience, while Palit's RTX 5080 GamingPro OC is the cheapest of the bunch, but still very expensive at £1115. Lets find out exactly how each of these cards perform.
RTX 5090 | RTX 5080 | RTX 4090 | RTX 4080 Super | RTX 4080 | |
Process | TSMC N4 | TSMC N4 | TSMC N4 | TSMC N4 | TSMC N4 |
SMs | 170 | 84 | 128 | 80 | 76 |
CUDA Cores | 21760 | 10752 | 16384 | 10240 | 9728 |
Tensor Cores | 680 | 336 | 512 | 320 | 304 |
RT Cores | 170 | 84 | 128 | 80 | 76 |
Texture Units | 680 | 336 | 512 | 320 | 304 |
ROPs | 176 | 112 | 176 | 112 | 112 |
GPU Boost Clock | 2407 MHz | 2617 MHz | 2520 MHz | 2550 MHz | 2505 MHz |
Memory Data Rate | 28 Gbps | 30 Gbps | 21 Gbps | 23 Gbps | 22.4 Gbps |
L2 Cache | 98304 KB | 65536 KB | 73729 KB | 65536 KB | 65536 KB |
Total Video Memory | 32GB GDDR7 | 16GB GDDR7 | 24GB GDDR6X | 16GB GDDR6X | 16GB GDDR6X |
Memory Interface | 512-bit | 256-bit | 384-bit | 256-bit | 256-bit |
Memory Bandwidth | 1792 GB/Sec | 960 GB/Sec | 1008 GB/Sec | 736 GB/Sec | 716.8 GB/Sec |
TGP | 575W | 360W | 450W | 320W | 320W |
First, a quick spec recap. Unlike the RTX 5090, which is built on the GB202 die, RTX 5080 uses smaller silicon as it is a full implementation of the GB203 die, measuring 378mm2. Comprised of 7 Graphics Processing Clusters (GPCs), each holds up to eight Texture Processing Clusters (TPCs), with a total of 42. Each TPC is home to two Streaming Multiprocessors (SMs), giving us 84, and each SM still holds 128 CUDA Cores, meaning the RTX 5080 has a total of 10752 shaders. We also find 84 RT cores, 336 Tensor cores, 336 Texture Units, and 112 ROPs.
This time around, however, there's no node-shrink, and GB203 remains fabricated on TSMC's N4 node, as per the RTX 40-series. As such, rated clock speed is barely changed this generation, with the RTX 5080 rated at 2617MHz, compared to the RTX 4080 Super's 2550MHz boost.
The memory configuration is also fairly similar, but sports one key upgrade – GDDR7 memory. The RTX 5080 comes equipped with 16GB, running at 30Gbps, and that puts total memory bandwidth at 960 GB/s, a 30% increase over the RTX 4080 Super. L2 cache remains at 65MB.
Power draw has also increased, with the RTX 5080 sporting a 360W TGP. This is something we focus on closely in this review, using our enhanced GPU power testing methodology, so read on for our most detailed power and efficiency testing yet.