1. Introduction2. ASRock RX 5600 XT Phantom Gaming D33. Testing Methodology4. 3DMark Fire Strike & Time Spy (1080p, 1440p, 4K)5. Battlefield V (1080p, 1440p, 4K)6. The Division 2 (1080p, 1440p, 4K)7. F1 2019 (1080p, 1440p, 4K)8. Far Cry New Dawn (1080p, 1440p, 4K)9. Gears 5 (1080p, 1440p, 4K)10. Ghost Recon: Breakpoint (1080p, 1440p, 4K)11. Metro Exodus (1080p, 1440p, 4K)12. Middle Earth: Shadow of War (1080p, 1440p, 4K)13. Red Dead Redemption 2 (1080p, 1440p, 4K)14. Shadow of the Tomb Raider (1080p, 1440p, 4K)15. Total War: Three Kingdoms (1080p, 1440p, 4K)16. Clock Speed17. Temperatures18. Acoustics19. Power Consumption20. Overclocking21. Closing Thoughts22. View All Pages

Here we present the average clock speed for each graphics card while running the 3DMark Time Spy stress test for 30 minutes. We use GPU-Z to record the GPU core frequency during the Time Spy runs. We calculate the average core frequency during the 30 minute run to present here.

If you read through all of our game testing, you will have noticed that, across the board, the ASRock Phantom Gaming D3 proved marginally slower than the Sapphire Pulse or Gaming OC. This is explained when looking at the card's average clock speed under load, as despite having the same 1750MHz boost clock as the other models, the ASRock average 1712MHz across our Time Spy test. This is 21MHz slower than the Gaming OC, and 30MHz slower than the Sapphire Pulse, so really not much of a difference at all but just enough to explain the fractionally slower frame rates we saw today.

Become a Patron!