1. Introduction2. AMD RX 7600 Reference Card3. Testing Methodology4. 3DMark Fire Strike & Time Spy5. 3DMark DirectX Raytracing6. Assassin's Creed Valhalla7. Cyberpunk 20778. Days Gone9. Dying Light 210. God of War11. Horizon Zero Dawn12. Marvel's Spider-Man Remastered13. A Plague Tale: Requiem14. Red Dead Redemption 215. Resident Evil Village16. Total War: Warhammer III17. Uncharted 4: A Thief's End18. Performance Summary (12-Game Average)19. Cost Per Frame Analysis20. Ray Tracing: Control21. Ray Tracing: Cyberpunk 207722. Ray Tracing: F1 2223. Ray Tracing: Hitman 324. Ray Tracing: Marvel's Spider-Man Remastered25. Ray Tracing: Metro Exodus Enhanced Edition26. Ray Tracing Performance Summary27. Clock Speed28. GPU Temperatures29. Acoustics30. Power Draw: 1080p31. Power Draw: 1440p32. Power Draw: 2160p (4K)33. Performance per Watt: 1080p34. Performance per Watt: 1440p35. Performance per Watt: 2160p (4K)36. Total System Power Draw37. Closing Thoughts38. View All Pages

Ray tracing 6-game average FPS

Overall then, the RX 7600 is certainly a much better ray tracing GPU than its predecessors, delivering 20% better performance on average compared to the RX 6600 XT. It's still no match for Nvidia here however, coming in 8% slower than the RTX 3060, and while it was just 10% slower than the 3060 Ti for rasterisation, it's 30% behind when looking at ray traced games.

Cost per frame, launch MSRP data

Even then, the £260 MSRP still helps the RX 7600 to offer reasonable value when looking at the ray tracing cost per frame, coming in level with the RTX 3060 Ti at 1080p – though it of course falls off at 1440p.

Cost per frame, current pricing data

We see similar results when looking at the value based on current prices – Nvidia GPUs have the upper hand here, not by much at 1080p, but by significant margins at 1440p.

Become a Patron!