KitGuru KitGuru.net – Tech News | Hardware News | Hardware Reviews | IOS | Mobile | Gaming | Graphics Cards
Cinebench
Cinebench is an application which renders a photorealistic 3D scene to benchmark a computer’s rendering performance, on one CPU core, all CPU cores or using the GPU. We run the test using the all-core CPU and single-thread CPU modes.
Handbrake Conversion
Handbrake is a free and open-source video transcoding tool that can be used to convert video files between different codecs, formats and resolutions. We measured the average frame rate achieved for a task of converting a 6.27GB 4K video using the Normal Profile setting and MP4 container. The test stresses all CPU cores to 100% and shows an affinity for memory bandwidth.
x265 Encoding
x265 Encoding tests system performance by encoding a 1080p test file using the x265/HEVC format.
CPU-related testing overview:
Ryzen 5’s fastest quad-core chip makes a strong start in the Cinebench multi-threaded test. The 4C8T AMD part can hang with fan favourites of Core i7 days gone by – the Sandy Bridge 2700K and Devil’s Canyon 4790K. Compared to the similarly-priced i5-7400, Ryzen 5 1500X is 50% faster out-of-the-box. An ability to overclock the Ryzen chip allows its lead to grow to 61%. Even the fast, multiplier-unlocked Core i5-7600K is outclassed by AMD’s 4C8T 1500X.
Single-threaded performance is where Intel’s well-tuned and fast Kaby Lake chips can guarantee victories. Or so one would have thought. The low clock speed of the i5-7400 sees it sitting in the bottom half of our performance hierarchy. Combine that with 200MHz of XFR headroom that boosts the 1500X to 3.9GHz on a single thread, and it is easy to see why AMD’s part takes the win this time. Compared to the multiplier-locked i5, Ryzen 5 1500X is 5% faster at stock and 9% faster when overclocked.
Handbrake is effective in leveraging the Ryzen 5 1500X processor’s eight threads. As such, the 4C4T Intel Core i5-7400 is handsomely outperformed to the tune of 21% at stock and 31% with AMD’s part overclocked. Ryzen 5 1500X is close to the performance levels of a Core i5-7600K, though Intel’s chip pulls ahead when its clock frequency is boosted to a lofty 4.9GHz.
Ryzen 5 1500X hands the Core i5-7400 another beating by way of the x265 encoding benchmark. AMD’s quad-core with SMT is 24% faster than the i5-7400 at stock. The 1500X’s lead grows to 33% when it is overclocked to 3.9GHz. Again, the 4C8T 1500X sits close to Core i5-7600K performance until that Kaby Lake chip turns on the afterburners and clocks to 4.9GHz.
eso no sirve
AMD are back in the game
Great to see you back AMD – Thanks for Ryzen!
Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family! !mj149d:
On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
!mj149d:
➽➽
➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash149HomePowerGetPay$97Hour… ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★:::::!mj149d:….,…..
“Grand Theft Auto V favours Intel hardware, despite its desire for high thread counts and core frequencies” With the 7700K beating the 6800K and Ryzen bottoming its charts, that game certainly does not favor high thread counts. Its a DX11 POS.
Any DX12 game should be tested with a Radeon GPU. It is quite clear by now that nVidia’s DX12 implementation fails to parallelize rendering workload properly. I’d even go as far as to say i beleive they may have built in some intel only optimizations (think GenuineIntel checks or such racket).
DX12 is Radeon territory. If you want to eliminate GPU Bottlenecks, use Fury X at 1080p. Or two 480s in CF. Gives much more representative results.
El i5 7400 es genial!!