Home / Component / APU / AMD Athlon 5350 (Kabini AM1 Platform) FS1b APU Review (w/ Sapphire R7 240 Low Profile)

AMD Athlon 5350 (Kabini AM1 Platform) FS1b APU Review (w/ Sapphire R7 240 Low Profile)

PCMark 8 v2

We test using the conventional test and the OpenCL-accelerated benchmark built into PCMark 8 v2.

Unfortunately we did not have access to data for the OpenCL-accelerated result for AMD's Kaveri A10-7850K APU.

pcmark 8

pcm8-conventional pcm8-OpenCL

The performance trend for Kabini's Athlon 5350, in comparison to the Kaveri flagship, continues. PCMark 8 v2 shows that the Athlon 5350 delivers roughly 50% of the general-usage performance of the A10-7850K.

A 15% performance boost is registered when running PCMark 8 v2's accelerated test. The test leverages the OpenCL power of Kabini's 128 GCN cores.

3DMark

We used 3DMark's ‘Fire Strike’ benchmark which is designed to test the gaming performance of PCs. We opted for the Normal setting, NOT the Extreme mode.

3dmark

3dmark

3DMark's graphics-heavy workload is where the relative performance of Kabini's R3 graphics system is shown. Users expecting discrete-level graphics performance from the Athlon 5350's GPU will realise that comparison graphics cards will sit in the market's entry-level segment. Unsurprisingly, Kaveri's R7 GPU is substantially more powerful.

Physics performance of the Athlon APU is strong. AMD's flagship Kaveri APU is able to offer 36% higher performance than Kabini's Athlon 5350 but costs around three times as much.

Sandra Multimedia

sandra multimedia

sandra-multimedia

The Sandra Multimedia results provide numerical reasoning as to why the Kabini flagship is a capable APU for use in a media playback environment.

Sandra Memory Bandwidth

sandra memory bandwidth

sandra-mem-band

Memory bandwidth is where the Kabini APUs start to splutter. With the AM1 platform limited to single-channel 1600MHz memory, it is no surprise that memory bandwidth is lacking in comparison to higher-frequency, dual-channel configurations.

Performance of the on-chip graphics system is closely related to the performance of the platform's memory subsystem.

Become a Patron!

Check Also

Intel’s x86S initiative has been abandoned

Intel has officially abandoned its plans for its own-developed x86S specification, a streamlined version of …

5 comments

  1. does the Single-Channel memory slow down add-on GPU cards as well ?

  2. wonder how much slower the CPU will be with a older gDDR5 mid-rangeR7 card
    I already got a R7 260x looking for a home for a 1.1/2 year till the upgrade
    wonder if moving to a cheap FM2 is best ! ??

  3. DesumetaruLiadz666

    I am running this cpu with an AMD RX 480. Just for the lulz and while i wait for my Intel CPU.

  4. Only register to say this: What in the hell was thinking the article maker, attacking that fake picture of the GPUZ ? I bought this piece of crap thinking the data was legit, just to find he take some random picture from internet from the hd 8400 card, and put that here. The real performance from the APU chip is 12,8 gb/sec, not 25,6.. You just ruin my build and make me to waste money (i already have a sempron 3850 who its GPU performs exactly the same. Damn internet, i dunno why i keep trusting jhon doe reviewers.
    Correct the data with real gpuz info dude, before more people makes a mistake.

  5. Man, did AMD screw up marketing this thing. “Rebranding” the socket from FSb1 to AM1 was a feat of search engine de-optimization. Marketing morons.