Home / Component / CPU / Intel preps launch of 665, 655, 665, no 655

Intel preps launch of 665, 655, 665, no 655

Everyone is waiting for the totally unlocked and unleashed i7-875k and a similarly unlocked i5 processor, but they can't seem to decide what to call it.

Products launch in a blaze of publicity and, budget permitting, a ton of marketing spend. Normally though, one thing would be clear, sharp and consistent.

The name of the product.

It's kind of important. When you look at reviews, adverts and information on a company's web site, it's nice when they use the same name throughout.

Those of you who follow KitGuru closely, will have noticed that we've had to re-edit all our strories on the new ‘Special k' i5 product, because the name kept changing. Even days it is the 665, odd days it is the 655 and twice a month we call it the 675.

This is the last time we'll be confused, because, with 100% certainty, it will be solved by bedtime tonight – or one unlucky marketing VP will be getting no supper. The marketing material sent to market includes 665k and 655k branding for one, single product.

KitGuru says: Now that can't be right – unless the HT section has its own name/personality!  Come on Intel, please confirm your chosen number.

Discuss in our forums over here, or just leave a quick comment below.

Become a Patron!

Check Also

Leo Says 77 – Intel ‘fesses up about Arrow Lake Core Ultra 200S

The launch of the new Intel Core Ultra 200S family of CPUs along with Z890 motherboards was a thorny process. KitGuru suffered along with pretty much every other review site on the planet and you may have noticed we held off from reviewing of the Core Ultra 9 285K, Core Ultra 7 265K and Core Ultra 5 245K as it is clear to us that Intel has some work to do before this platform is ready for action.

7 comments

  1. Ding Dong Round 5

    Clearly they need more interpersonal communications !

  2. lol, hey even billion dollar companies fuck things up at times. funny

  3. Many companies mess up naming really – nvidia did it with their cards for ages, numbers didnt relate to the ranges etc. sometimes lower numbers were better etc.

  4. I vote for 655 – why? just sounds better :p

  5. Far too many CPUS in the range, thats the problem. tighten it up and lower prices

  6. Sounds like another processor no one needs, right?

  7. Foreskinforall

    Just shows the confusion that must go on when you have hundreds and thousands of employees. the left hand doesnt know what the right is doing