Home / Channel / General Tech / Steam now requires users to disclose paid endorsements

Steam now requires users to disclose paid endorsements

Steam is buckling down on user transparency when it comes to reviews and recommendations. Anyone writing a review or recommending a game must now disclose any paid endorsements, something that people should have been doing anyway but it is nice to see Valve enforcing it now.

Disclosure must also be given if you are paid to broadcast a specific title, according to the updated Steam Subscriber Agreement, released by Valve today.

steam-600x300

The new agreement reads: “”If you use Steam services (e.g. the Steam Curators' Lists or the Steam Broadcasting service) to promote or endorse a product, service or event in return for any kind of consideration from a third party (including non-monetary rewards such as free games), you must clearly indicate the source of such consideration to your audience”.

Valve’s new curators list launched last year in the Steam explorers update, making it easier for Steam users to discover new titles that they may have overlooked otherwise. In order to become a curator on Steam, you must be a moderator of a group; you will also need at least ten recommendations to make.

This call for disclosure comes shortly after Valve had to ask developers to stop trading game keys for Steam Greenlight votes.

Discuss on our Facebook page, HERE.

KitGuru Says: It seems a bit dodgy to take compensation, monetary or otherwise, to recommend a certain game, it is also dishonest to the audience if it is not properly disclosed. This seems like the right thing for Valve to do.

Become a Patron!

Check Also

Sony is now the largest shareholder of Kadokawa, FromSoftware’s parent company

After weeks of reports regarding Sony acquiring Kadokawa, the story has concluded. Instead of a …

2 comments

  1. Now we’ll see who the more legitimate reviewers are compared to the endorsed reviewers. That will confirm my suspicions when I see majorly Biased good reviews on someone who has.. 0.1 hours on the game.

  2. chaostheory66821

    Also for those that get around this by just letting the game run, to rack up time, and then posting a biased review. Some games are so bad that you can tell the company behind it went out of their way to either do it themselves, or to hire someone to do it for them. When I see this, I just move on. I am sure as hell not going to reward the company for such dishonesty–perhaps they should just make a decent game, instead?