Home / Component / Graphics / Asus Strix R9 Fury with DirectCU III: Custom design, massive cooler

Asus Strix R9 Fury with DirectCU III: Custom design, massive cooler

Asustek Computer will use its own printed circuit board design as well as its own high-performance cooling system on its upcoming Strix R9 Fury graphics card based on AMD’ Radeon R9 Fury graphics processing unit. The custom PCB and the massive cooler are designed to improve overclocking potential of the product.

The Asus Strix R9 Fury graphics board will sport a considerably taller printed circuit board than AMD’s reference design, based on pictures published by WccfTech. The taller PCB is needed to accommodate an all-new multi-phase voltage regulator module (VRM) featuring concrete-core inductors, solid-state black metallic capacitors and hardened MOSFETs. The reworked VRM is designed to give cleaner and higher volume power delivery to the “Fiji” graphics processor and memory, which could result in better overclockability.

asus_strix_r9_fury

The Strix R9 Fury graphics card is also equipped with exact same DirectCU III cooler with three fans as the Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti. The DirectCU III cooling system uses a massive aluminium radiator with thin fins, two thick 10mm heatpipes and two regular heatpipes. The new fans used on the DirectCU III cooler feature new wing-blade design that delivers maximum air flow and improved 105 per cent static pressure over the heat sink, while producing less noise compared to standard fans. Asus believes that its DirectCU III cooler transports 40 per cent more heat away from GPUs compared to reference coolers. In addition, DirectCU III shuts its fans down during light load.

AMD’s Radeon R9 Fury graphics adapters will be based on a cut-down version of the “Fiji” graphics processing unit with 3584 stream processors, 192 texture units, 64 raster operations pipelines and 4096-bit memory interface. Manufacturers of graphics cards are expected to release factory-overclocked versions of such graphics cards with increased GPU clock-rates. Higher frequencies are projected to compensate for the lower amount of stream processors and texture units and shrink performance gap between the Radeon R9 Fury and the Radeon R9 Fury X.

asus_strix_r9_fury_1

Advanced Micro Devices and its partners plan to start sales of AMD Radeon R9 Fury graphics cards on the 14th of July. Select online stores are already taking pre-orders on the Asustek Computer’s Strix R9 Fury graphics card with 4GB of memory and DirectCU III cooling system (ASUS STRIX-R9FURY-DC3-4G-GAMING).

Asustek and AMD did not comment on the news-story.

Discuss on our Facebook page, HERE.

KitGuru Says: Looks like Asustek’s Strix R9 Fury will be considerably more interesting solution than those based on AMD’s reference design. But will it be able to hit truly high clock-rates? We have no idea. What we are sure about is that the board will not feature a noisy cooling system because the DirectCU III is one of the quietest cooling solutions for graphics cards ever.

Become a Patron!

Check Also

First AMD UDNA GPUs expected in 2026

AMD's unreleased UDNA GPU architecture is back in the news, with a fresh leak suggesting …

10 comments

  1. Unnecessarily big for a Fury card…

  2. considering the redesigned power delivery system, they could go nuts with the extra space the fiji chip allows, and that can only bring good things

  3. i think amd overclockability is a distant utopia.

  4. not really, i’ve got a 10% OC on my 7850 and it’s still running pretty well. hottest it goes is 60c or so under load

  5. Jonathan D Brown

    And I manage to pretty easily get 20% core overclock and a 40% ram speed overclock with my 290x.

    I can push them higher and still run stable but i start to get diminishing returns instead of increasing as happens with overclocking.

  6. I think you just want it to be.

  7. 10% OC on my 290x (1100Mhz) gives me about the same or better benchmark results as I got on my 1508MHz 970.

  8. What online retailers are selling these on launch day? I plan on getting one as soon as possible tomorrow/ Much Appreciated for an answer

  9. yeah i think there will be more 2 fans models.. 3 fans will certainly be more popular for those that want to oc.
    im really most interested in the nano myself.. especially being that it is a lower clocked uncut fiji.
    i know the fury will be more powerful and have less limits for oc but the nano is suppose to be at least a little bit stronger than the 290x..
    give me 2 of those at that power draw and the widest 1440p freesync. just epic

  10. What’s the temp difference though? Trying to compare Maxwell OC headroom to the 290X seems a bit of an absurd battle.