Home / Tech News / Featured Tech News / Valve opens up about upcoming Steam changes, will crack down on fake games

Valve opens up about upcoming Steam changes, will crack down on fake games

It looks like Valve is finally looking to crack down on ‘asset flippers' and address concerns regarding the quality of games flooding the Steam store on a daily basis. Similarly to how Valve decided to get more involved with the press earlier this year, Valve has also begun consulting with two popular game critics, TotalBiscuit and Jim Sterling, who have both had their fair share of grievances with poor developers publishing on Steam.

After a meeting last Friday, both TotalBiscuit and Jim Sterling have published videos online going over their meeting with Valve's Steam platform team. While there, they had the opportunity to hear Valve's stance on ‘fake games' and exchange ideas on how to deal with the matter. These changes won't all appear right away but it seems that a key part of Valve's plan is to kill off asset flippers by making their business model completely unprofitable on Steam.

For those who don't know ‘asset flips' or fake games as Valve likes to put it, are poorly stitched together games created solely out of assets found on the Unity Engine store. Developers will create a ton of these games, dump them all on to Steam and then earn their profit from the sale of trading cards.

Valve wants to try and stop this business practise by burying fake games under its new algorithms while also potentially introducing restrictions to trading cards. However, as with any automated system, there is also the possibility that legitimately good games will still go undiscovered by the masses, so to help combat this, Valve is currently mulling over the idea of a ‘Steam Explorers' program.

Under this opt-in initiative, dedicated Steam users will be able to go through a list of games that haven't been selling too well. They will have to buy that game, check it out and help figure out whether or not it should receive a boost in the discoverability queue. The fact that explorers still have to buy games for evaluation could hurt interest so Valve is also looking at ways it can make the program more attractive, whether it be via Steam badges/community rewards, or with a ‘no strings attached' refund once a week. Explorers will also get access to their own forum.

Finally, there are some changes currently being talked about for the Steam Curators feature. These will include the ability to embed videos into curation lists, while also giving curators information, such as how their recommendation impacted a game's sales. Finally, at some point, developers may be able to use the curator function to supply review copies of games.

Right now, all of these ideas are still in the early stages at Valve, so don't expect any immediate changes. Still, it is encouraging to see Valve finally opening up about its inner-workings this year and actively consulting with others to exchange ideas and improve Steam overall.

KitGuru Says: I must admit, I've been very impressed with Valve's efforts to stay in touch with the community so far this year. Hopefully this new found transparency sticks around as it seems things are heading in a much better direction. 

Become a Patron!

Check Also

Intel’s x86S initiative has been abandoned

Intel has officially abandoned its plans for its own-developed x86S specification, a streamlined version of …

4 comments

  1. 10,531
    Titles You Marked As ‘Not Interested’

  2. What about some sort of invite to the system for a group off testers. Say… 1000 of a little more people because steam has millions… then he people inside get access to the games not selling good or something and say… they get 10 hours free instead of two… no need to buy and this can be used for the testers to look at the game more and see why it’s not selling so good and then submit a case file or review or whatever after the 10hour test…. heck even submit to a special part of steam dedicated to this sort of thing and once the users have tested the game… valve make a judgement call on he percent of people saying yes it’s good or no it’s buggy and unplayable and a cash grab…. this is a good idea I think to help because no money is spent or lost. Only testing a product not selling good.

  3. Rebeccammartinez

    Google is paying $97 per hour! Work for few hours & have longer with friends and family! !wr226c:
    On monday I got a great new mclaren f1 from having earned $12778 this last four weeks.. 3 to 5 hours of work a day… Weekly paychecks… Bonus opportunities…Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
    !wr226c:
    ➽➽
    ➽➽➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialCashJobs226OnlineWorld/GetPaid$97/Hour ★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫:::!wr226u:…..

  4. Simona Draksaite

    I see the potential new system as more of an issue than the old system. Depending on who these “explorers” are they will hold the power in their hands on should a game get sales or not. Same with curators. I see serious concerns about bought corruption, same as right now game journalism is doing payed reviews. I think that if you still need to buy a game to be an “explorer” then everyone should be allowed to participate.